DOJ-OGR-00010073.jpg

407 KB

Extraction Summary

5
People
3
Organizations
2
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court transcript / deposition
File Size: 407 KB
Summary

This document is a page from a deposition transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) involving a witness named Edelstein. The testimony focuses on the investigation into 'Juror No. 1' (identified as Catherine M. Conrad), specifically regarding her voir dire responses and a suspension report found via Westlaw. The witness discusses receiving a memo from David Benhamou while in San Francisco that detailed these findings.

People (5)

Name Role Context
Edelstein Witness/Deponent
Answering questions regarding the investigation of a juror.
Theresa Trzaskoma Partner
Partner of Edelstein; characterized a document as a 'dossier'.
David Benhamou Author
Wrote a memo to file regarding Juror No. 1.
Juror No. 1 Juror / Subject of Investigation
Subject of a memo regarding voir dire responses and suspension reports.
Catherine M. Conrad Subject of Report
Name appearing in a suspension report with a Bronxville address; implied to be Juror No. 1.

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
Westlaw
Source of a report mentioned in the testimony.
Appellate Division
Issued an order mentioned in the memo.
Southern District Reporters, P.C.
Court reporting agency.

Timeline (1 events)

Unknown
Receipt of David Benhamou's memo by Edelstein.
San Francisco

Locations (2)

Location Context
Location of the witness (Edelstein) when they received the memo via email.
Address associated with Catherine M. Conrad in the suspension report.

Relationships (2)

Edelstein Professional Partner Theresa Trzaskoma
Question refers to 'your own partner, Theresa Trzaskoma'.
Edelstein Colleague David Benhamou
Edelstein received and reviewed a memo written by Benhamou.

Key Quotes (3)

"At what point did you become familiar with the fact that your own partner, Theresa Trzaskoma, characterized it as a dossier?"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00010073.jpg
Quote #1
"It just laid out I think Juror No. 1's voir dire responses, it I think mentioned that there was the Appellate Division order and that there was a link to the Westlaw report."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00010073.jpg
Quote #2
"Did you notice also that the Catherine M. Conrad in the suspension report had a Bronxville address?"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00010073.jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,259 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 646-2 Filed 08/24/22 Page 105 of 130
A-5790
333
C2GFDAU3 Edelstein
1 put together and the Westlaw report.
2 Q. At what point did you become familiar with the fact that
3 your own partner, Theresa Trzaskoma, characterized it as a
4 dossier?
5 A. Several weeks later.
6 Q. So you received this information in the form of the file or
7 the memo to file by David Benhamou, is that correct?
8 A. Yes.
9 Q. You were where when you received it? San Francisco?
10 A. I was in San Francisco.
11 Q. Who sent it to you?
12 A. I was given a link to it, attachment in the e-mail.
13 Q. And the link was to what?
14 A. Was to the memo that David Benhamou had written.
15 Q. And the memo said what?
16 A. It just laid out I think Juror No. 1's voir dire responses,
17 it I think mentioned that there was the Appellate Division
18 order and that there was a link to the Westlaw report.
19 Q. Did you look at the Appellate Division order?
20 A. Yes.
21 Q. And did you notice that the Catherine Conrad in the
22 suspension report had a middle initial of M.?
23 A. Yes.
24 Q. Did you notice also that the Catherine M. Conrad in the
25 suspension report had a Bronxville address?
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00010073

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document