This document is a page from a deposition transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) involving a witness named Edelstein. The testimony focuses on the investigation into 'Juror No. 1' (identified as Catherine M. Conrad), specifically regarding her voir dire responses and a suspension report found via Westlaw. The witness discusses receiving a memo from David Benhamou while in San Francisco that detailed these findings.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Edelstein | Witness/Deponent |
Answering questions regarding the investigation of a juror.
|
| Theresa Trzaskoma | Partner |
Partner of Edelstein; characterized a document as a 'dossier'.
|
| David Benhamou | Author |
Wrote a memo to file regarding Juror No. 1.
|
| Juror No. 1 | Juror / Subject of Investigation |
Subject of a memo regarding voir dire responses and suspension reports.
|
| Catherine M. Conrad | Subject of Report |
Name appearing in a suspension report with a Bronxville address; implied to be Juror No. 1.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Westlaw |
Source of a report mentioned in the testimony.
|
|
| Appellate Division |
Issued an order mentioned in the memo.
|
|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Court reporting agency.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location of the witness (Edelstein) when they received the memo via email.
|
|
|
Address associated with Catherine M. Conrad in the suspension report.
|
"At what point did you become familiar with the fact that your own partner, Theresa Trzaskoma, characterized it as a dossier?"Source
"It just laid out I think Juror No. 1's voir dire responses, it I think mentioned that there was the Appellate Division order and that there was a link to the Westlaw report."Source
"Did you notice also that the Catherine M. Conrad in the suspension report had a Bronxville address?"Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,259 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document