DOJ-OGR-00008728.jpg
484 KB
Extraction Summary
1
People
3
Organizations
2
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court filing (jury instructions)
File Size:
484 KB
Summary
This document is page 22 of 83 from a court filing (Document 565) dated December 19, 2021, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). It contains Jury Instruction No. 15 regarding 'Count Two: Enticement to Engage in Illegal Sexual Activity,' specifically defining the 'First Element' and the legal definition of acting 'Knowingly.' It outlines the burden of proof on the government to establish that Maxwell persuaded or coerced individuals to travel in interstate commerce.
People (1)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Maxwell | Defendant |
Subject of the jury instruction regarding intent and actions in Count Two.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| United States District Court |
Implied by the case number format and filing header.
|
|
| Department of Justice (DOJ) |
Indicated by the Bates stamp 'DOJ-OGR'.
|
|
| Government |
Prosecution, mentioned as the party that must prove the element beyond a reasonable doubt.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2021-12-19
Filing of Document 565 (Jury Instructions) in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE
Court Record
Locations (2)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Mentioned in the definition of 'State'.
|
|
|
Mentioned in the definition of 'State'.
|
Relationships (1)
The government must prove beyond a reasonable doubt is that Ms. Maxwell knowingly persuaded...
Key Quotes (3)
"Science has not yet devised a manner of looking into a person’s mind and knowing what that person is thinking."Source
DOJ-OGR-00008728.jpg
Quote #1
"Ms. Maxwell knowingly persuaded or induced or enticed or coerced an individual to travel in interstate commerce"Source
DOJ-OGR-00008728.jpg
Quote #2
"Whether Ms. Maxwell acted knowingly may be proven by Ms. Maxwell’s conduct and by all of the facts and circumstances surrounding the case."Source
DOJ-OGR-00008728.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,239 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 565 Filed 12/19/21 Page 22 of 83
1 Instruction No. 15: Count Two: Enticement to Engage in Illegal Sexual Activity – First
2 Element
2 Element
3 The first element of Count Two which the government must prove beyond a reasonable
4 doubt is that Ms. Maxwell knowingly persuaded or induced or enticed or coerced an individual
5 to travel in interstate commerce, as alleged in the Indictment. The terms “persuaded,” “induced,”
6 “enticed," and “coerced” have their ordinary, everyday meanings.
4 doubt is that Ms. Maxwell knowingly persuaded or induced or enticed or coerced an individual
5 to travel in interstate commerce, as alleged in the Indictment. The terms “persuaded,” “induced,”
6 “enticed," and “coerced” have their ordinary, everyday meanings.
7 The term “interstate commerce” simply means movement from one state to another. The
8 term “State” includes a State of the United States and the District of Columbia.
8 term “State” includes a State of the United States and the District of Columbia.
9 “Knowingly” Defined
10 Ms. Maxwell must have acted knowingly. An act is done knowingly when it is done
11 voluntarily and intentionally and not because of accident, mistake, or some other innocent reason.
11 voluntarily and intentionally and not because of accident, mistake, or some other innocent reason.
12 Now, knowledge is a matter of inference from the proven facts. Science has not yet
13 devised a manner of looking into a person’s mind and knowing what that person is thinking.
14 Whether Ms. Maxwell acted knowingly may be proven by Ms. Maxwell’s conduct and by all of
15 the facts and circumstances surrounding the case.
13 devised a manner of looking into a person’s mind and knowing what that person is thinking.
14 Whether Ms. Maxwell acted knowingly may be proven by Ms. Maxwell’s conduct and by all of
15 the facts and circumstances surrounding the case.
21
DOJ-OGR-00008728
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document