An email chain from July 2021 involving US Attorney's Office (SDNY) officials discussing an unsolicited email from an individual identifying themselves as the Director of Central Intelligence from 1993 to 1995 (historically R. James Woolsey). This individual offered to connect prosecutors with a female journalist who 'broke open the Epstein case' in 2010 via the Daily Beast, stating she had information to provide. The USANYS officials discussed the email internally, noting a 'separate investigation,' and seemingly decided not to reply directly to the solicitation while keeping colleagues aware.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Redacted Sender | Former Director of Central Intelligence (1993-1995) |
Sent an email to USANYS officials offering information regarding child trafficking and Epstein. (Note: R. James Wools...
|
| Redacted Journalist | Journalist |
Described in the email as the person who 'broke open the Epstein case, in July 2010' via a Daily Beast 6 part series....
|
| USANYS Officials | Prosecutors/Attorneys |
Recipients of the email chain discussing how to handle the solicitation. Includes multiple redacted individuals.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| USANYS |
United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (email domain/suffix of recipients).
|
|
| Daily Beast |
Publication mentioned where the journalist published a 6-part series on Epstein (2010-2015).
|
|
| Central Intelligence Agency |
Implied by sender identifying as 'Director of Central Intelligence'.
|
"My name [Redacted] I served as Director of Central Intelligence from 1993 to 1995."Source
"i believe the issue of child trafficking is extremely important."Source
"[Redacted] who broke open the Epstein case, in July 2010 (see Daily Beast 6 part series- 2010-2015), has information she would like to provide to you."Source
"Given that, as well as the fact of the unit's separate investigatio[n]..."Source
"Our thoughts exactly. As noted below, [Redacted] is not going to reply, but wanted you to be aware of this nonetheless."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (2,780 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document