HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026713.jpg

793 KB

Extraction Summary

0
People
1
Organizations
2
Locations
0
Events
0
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Financial report / statistical analysis page
File Size: 793 KB
Summary

This document appears to be page 33 of a larger financial report produced to the House Oversight Committee (Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026713). It contains three statistical figures (Fig 22, 23, and 24) analyzing the adoption of ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) factors by sovereign investors. The data covers adoption rates, screen usage percentages, and the importance rating of specific ESG issues like climate change and human rights.

Organizations (1)

Name Type Context
House Oversight Committee
Referenced via Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026713

Locations (2)

Location Context
Region analyzed in Fig 22
Region analyzed in Fig 22

Key Quotes (3)

"Sovereign adoption of ESG factors"
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026713.jpg
Quote #1
"Sample is based on sovereign investors and excludes central banks."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026713.jpg
Quote #2
"Rating scored as of Q1 of the given year."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026713.jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (931 characters)

Fig 22. Sovereign adoption of ESG factors (% citations)
West (ex-US)
91
Rest of world
32
Sample is based on sovereign investors and excludes central banks.
Sample: West (ex-US)=11, Rest of world=44.
Fig 23. ESG screen usage (% citations, ESG users)
Security negative screen
45
Manager negative screen
32
Manager positive screen
23
Security positive screen
18
Sample is based on sovereign investors and excludes central banks. Multiple responses.
Sample=22.
Fig 24. ESG issue importance (ESG users)
Environmental factor
Social factor
Governance factor
7.9 Climate change
7.8 Sustainability
7.2 Financial disclosure
7.2 Energy resources
6.9 Human rights
6.9 Executive remuneration
6.4 Diversity
5.8 Water scarcity
Sample is based on sovereign investors and excludes central banks. Rating on a scale from 1 to 10 where 10 is the most important. Rating scored as of Q1 of the given year.
Sample=22.
33
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026713

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document