DOJ-OGR-00008328.jpg
585 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
585 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on December 10, 2021. It details a discussion between the prosecution (Ms. Moe), the defense (Mr. Pagliuca), and the Judge regarding the physical inspection of evidence that occurred on November 1st. The Judge instructs the government not to mention specific evidence with uncertain admissibility in their opening statement and transitions the proceedings to discuss the admissibility of co-conspirator statements.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Moe | Prosecutor/Government Attorney |
Confirming evidence availability and agreeing not to mention specific evidence in opening statements.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the hearing, ruling on admissibility, and issuing instructions regarding opening statements.
|
| Mr. Pagliuca | Defense Attorney |
Responding to the judge regarding whether there are further issues before moving on.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. | ||
| Government | ||
| Defense |
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied jurisdiction based on court reporter stamp (likely SDNY)
|
Relationships (1)
Moe represents the government/prosecution; Pagliuca speaks for the defense.
Key Quotes (4)
"We notified the defense in a letter that it was available for inspection."Source
DOJ-OGR-00008328.jpg
Quote #1
"I think, given the uncertainty as to admission, the government should not mention it in its opening."Source
DOJ-OGR-00008328.jpg
Quote #2
"So next is the admissibility of co-conspirator statements."Source
DOJ-OGR-00008328.jpg
Quote #3
"Based on the law, of course the government has to make the showing that's required during the course of the trial."Source
DOJ-OGR-00008328.jpg
Quote #4
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,468 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 536 Filed 12/10/21 Page 18 of 43 18
LBNAMAXTps
LBNAMAXTps
1 MS. MOE: That's correct, your Honor. We made it
2 available for inspection this summer. We notified the defense
3 in a letter that it was available for inspection. The defense
4 asked for an inspection the week before our conference on
5 November 1st. I made it available for inspection that day.
6 They personally inspected it. We're happy to continue to make
7 that available for inspection to the defense.
8 THE COURT: I'm very happy to hear that. Thank you.
9 I appreciate that. And I think that takes care of that for
10 now.
11 I guess one question: I think, given the uncertainty
12 as to admission, the government should not mention it in its
13 opening.
14 MS. MOE: Of course, your Honor. Thank you.
15 THE COURT: Anything before we move on?
16 MR. PAGLIUCA: No, your Honor. Thank you.
17 THE COURT: So next is the admissibility of
18 co-conspirator statements. I do appreciate the efforts to come
19 to reasonable agreement, of course, with the defense preserving
20 objections as to ultimate admissibility. Based on the law, of
21 course the government has to make the showing that's required
22 during the course of the trial.
23 There are two statements that are exemplars that
24 remain in issue, and I think, starting with the second one
25 first: so the second one, it seems to me, is not being offered
2 available for inspection this summer. We notified the defense
3 in a letter that it was available for inspection. The defense
4 asked for an inspection the week before our conference on
5 November 1st. I made it available for inspection that day.
6 They personally inspected it. We're happy to continue to make
7 that available for inspection to the defense.
8 THE COURT: I'm very happy to hear that. Thank you.
9 I appreciate that. And I think that takes care of that for
10 now.
11 I guess one question: I think, given the uncertainty
12 as to admission, the government should not mention it in its
13 opening.
14 MS. MOE: Of course, your Honor. Thank you.
15 THE COURT: Anything before we move on?
16 MR. PAGLIUCA: No, your Honor. Thank you.
17 THE COURT: So next is the admissibility of
18 co-conspirator statements. I do appreciate the efforts to come
19 to reasonable agreement, of course, with the defense preserving
20 objections as to ultimate admissibility. Based on the law, of
21 course the government has to make the showing that's required
22 during the course of the trial.
23 There are two statements that are exemplars that
24 remain in issue, and I think, starting with the second one
25 first: so the second one, it seems to me, is not being offered
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00008328
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document