HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019614.jpg

1.65 MB

Extraction Summary

7
People
12
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
5
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Book page / evidence exhibit
File Size: 1.65 MB
Summary

This document is page 126 from the book 'How America Lost Its Secrets' (indicated by the subject matter and ISBN in the footer), likely authored by Edward Jay Epstein (unrelated to Jeffrey Epstein, though included in this document set). The text details the negative assessments of Edward Snowden's data theft by high-ranking US officials including Admiral Michael Rogers, General Martin Dempsey, and Lt. General Mike Flynn. The officials argue that the majority of files stolen were military secrets unrelated to domestic surveillance and caused significant damage to national security.

People (7)

Name Role Context
Edward Snowden Subject of text / Former contractor
Accused of stealing classified data; described as not being a whistleblower by officials.
Admiral Michael Rogers Head of the NSA
Replaced General Alexander in March 2014; stated Snowden is not a whistleblower.
General Alexander Former Head of the NSA
Replaced by Michael Rogers.
General Martin Dempsey Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff
Testified before the House Armed Services Committee regarding the cost and scope of the Snowden breach.
Lieutenant General Mike Flynn DIA Director
Directed the study on the breach; testified that it caused grave damage to national security.
John Walker Spy Ring Leader
Historical comparison; provided Navy reports to KGB during the Cold War.
Morell Deputy Director of the CIA (2013)
Wrote that Snowden's action went beyond taking a handful of documents.

Organizations (12)

Name Type Context
NSA
National Security Agency
Princeton University
Location of public forum where Rogers spoke
Congress
Legislative body Rogers explained the situation to
United States government
Entity Snowden stole from
Joint Chiefs of Staff
Chaired by Martin Dempsey
House Armed Services Committee
Committee Dempsey testified before
Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA)
Produced a report on the breach
Department of Defense
Source of 900,000 military files taken
Senate Select Committee on Intelligence
Committee Flynn testified before
Navy
Compromised by John Walker spy ring
KGB
Recipient of intel from John Walker
CIA
Central Intelligence Agency

Timeline (2 events)

2014-03
Admiral Michael Rogers spoke at a public forum.
Princeton University
2014-03-06
General Martin Dempsey testified before the House Armed Services Committee.
Washington D.C. (implied)

Locations (1)

Location Context
Location of public forum

Relationships (2)

Admiral Michael Rogers Professional Succession General Alexander
Rogers, who replaced General Alexander as head of the NSA
Snowden stole from the United States government

Key Quotes (5)

"Edward Snowden is not the ‘whistleblower’ some have labeled him to be."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019614.jpg
Quote #1
"Snowden stole from the United States government a large amount of classified information, a small portion of which is germane to his apparent central argument regarding NSA and privacy issues."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019614.jpg
Quote #2
"The vast majority of the electronic documents that Snowden exfiltrated from our highest levels of security had nothing to do with exposing government oversight of domestic activities."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019614.jpg
Quote #3
"over 900,000 military files"
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019614.jpg
Quote #4
"has caused grave damage to our national security."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019614.jpg
Quote #5

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (2,453 characters)

126 | HOW AMERICA LOST ITS SECRETS
ies. The holders of this darker view of Snowden base it on classified reports of the full extent of the theft of classified data. Those officials believe that only a handful of the tens of thousands of documents he stole involved domestic surveillance and that those few documents served as a cover for a much larger theft.
Admiral Michael Rogers, who replaced General Alexander as head of the NSA in March 2014, said at a public forum at Princeton University, “Edward Snowden is not the ‘whistleblower’ some have labeled him to be.” He further explained to Congress, “Snowden stole from the United States government a large amount of classified information, a small portion of which is germane to his apparent central argument regarding NSA and privacy issues.”
General Martin Dempsey, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, went even further. In testifying before the House Armed Services Committee on March 6, 2014, after estimating that the Snowden breach could cost the military “billions” to repair, he added, “The vast majority of the electronic documents that Snowden exfiltrated from our highest levels of security had nothing to do with exposing government oversight of domestic activities.” Dempsey based this assessment on a then still-secret Defense Intelligence Agency report on the breach. The classified DIA report showed that Snowden took “over 900,000” military files from the Department of Defense in addition to the NSA files he had taken. The Defense Department loss in terms of the number of files stolen actually exceeded the loss—in sheer numbers—of NSA documents. Lieutenant General Mike Flynn, the DIA director who directed the study, testified to the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence that the breach “has caused grave damage to our national security.”
To be sure, this was not the first time that the cryptological branches of the military had been compromised. The spy ring of John Walker had provided thousands of the navy’s reports on breaking Russian ciphers to the KGB during the Cold War. But the Snowden breach exposing military sources was an order of magnitude greater than any past breach.
The CIA’s assessment was no less grim. Morell, the deputy director of the CIA in 2013, wrote that Snowden’s action went beyond taking the handful of documents, such as the FISA order, “that addressed
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 126
9/29/16 5:51 PM
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019614

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document