DOJ-OGR-00017219.jpg
622 KB
Extraction Summary
2
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript (jury instructions/charge)
File Size:
622 KB
Summary
This document is page 198 of a court transcript (Document 767, filed Aug 10, 2022) from the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). It contains the judge's instructions (Charge) to the jury regarding legal definitions of 'knowingly' and 'intentionally,' as well as specific instructions (No. 16 and 17) regarding Count Two: Enticement to engage in illegal sexual activity. The text defines interstate commerce and outlines the government's burden of proof regarding Maxwell's intent to cause an individual to engage in criminal sexual activity under New York law.
People (2)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Maxwell | Defendant |
Subject of the jury instructions regarding intent and knowledge.
|
| The individual | Victim/Object of crime |
Unnamed person(s) alleged to have been enticed to engage in illegal sexual activity.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The Government |
Entity that must prove elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.
|
|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Listed in the footer.
|
|
| DOJ |
Department of Justice (inferred from footer stamp DOJ-OGR).
|
Timeline (1 events)
2022-08-10
Filing of court transcript (Document 767) containing jury instructions.
Southern District of New York (implied by case number and reporter)
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Referenced regarding 'offense under New York law'.
|
Relationships (1)
Government must prove Ms. Maxwell acted with intent.
Key Quotes (4)
"Ms. Maxwell must have acted knowingly."Source
DOJ-OGR-00017219.jpg
Quote #1
"Science has not yet devised a manner of looking into a person's mind and knowing what that person is thinking."Source
DOJ-OGR-00017219.jpg
Quote #2
"The third element of Count Two which the government must prove beyond a reasonable doubt is that Ms. Maxwell acted with the intent that the individual would engage in sexual activity for which any person can be charged with a criminal offense under New York law."Source
DOJ-OGR-00017219.jpg
Quote #3
""interstate commerce" simply means movement between one state and another."Source
DOJ-OGR-00017219.jpg
Quote #4
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,696 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 767 Filed 08/10/22 Page 198 of 257 3032
LCKVMAX8 Charge
LCKVMAX8 Charge
1 Ms. Maxwell must have acted knowingly. An act is done
2 knowingly when it's done voluntarily and intentionally and not
3 because of accident, mistake, or some other innocent reason.
4 Now, knowledge is a matter of inference from the proven facts.
5 Science has not yet devised a manner of looking into a person's
6 mind and knowing what that person is thinking. Whether Ms.
7 Maxwell acted knowingly may be proven by Ms. Maxwell's conduct
8 and by all of the facts and circumstances surrounding the case.
9 Instruction No. 16. Count Two. Enticement to engage
10 in illegal sexual activity. Second element.
11 The second element of Count Two which the government
12 must prove beyond a reasonable doubt is that the individual
13 traveled in interstate commerce as alleged in the indictment.
14 As I just stated, "interstate commerce" simply means movement
15 between one state and another.
16 Instruction No. 17. Count Two. Enticement to engage
17 in illegal sexual activity. Third element.
18 The third element of Count Two which the government
19 must prove beyond a reasonable doubt is that Ms. Maxwell acted
20 with the intent that the individual would engage in sexual
21 activity for which any person can be charged with a criminal
22 offense under New York law.
23 "Intentionally" defined.
24 A person acts intentionally when the act is the
25 product of her conscious objective; that is, when she acts
2 knowingly when it's done voluntarily and intentionally and not
3 because of accident, mistake, or some other innocent reason.
4 Now, knowledge is a matter of inference from the proven facts.
5 Science has not yet devised a manner of looking into a person's
6 mind and knowing what that person is thinking. Whether Ms.
7 Maxwell acted knowingly may be proven by Ms. Maxwell's conduct
8 and by all of the facts and circumstances surrounding the case.
9 Instruction No. 16. Count Two. Enticement to engage
10 in illegal sexual activity. Second element.
11 The second element of Count Two which the government
12 must prove beyond a reasonable doubt is that the individual
13 traveled in interstate commerce as alleged in the indictment.
14 As I just stated, "interstate commerce" simply means movement
15 between one state and another.
16 Instruction No. 17. Count Two. Enticement to engage
17 in illegal sexual activity. Third element.
18 The third element of Count Two which the government
19 must prove beyond a reasonable doubt is that Ms. Maxwell acted
20 with the intent that the individual would engage in sexual
21 activity for which any person can be charged with a criminal
22 offense under New York law.
23 "Intentionally" defined.
24 A person acts intentionally when the act is the
25 product of her conscious objective; that is, when she acts
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00017219
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document