This is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, USA v. Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. Defense attorney Mr. Everdell argues for the admissibility of records to potentially impeach a witness's testimony regarding public assistance timelines relative to the charged conspiracy. Following a recess, the defense and prosecution (represented by Ms. Pomerantz) agree on redactions for a specific exhibit to be presented to the witness.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Mr. Everdell | Defense Attorney |
Speaking to the court regarding witness testimony, records, and redactions.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the proceedings, ordering a recess, and approving agreements.
|
| Ms. Pomerantz | Prosecutor (Government) |
Confirming acceptability of the defense's proposal regarding exhibits.
|
| Aznaran | Witness |
Mentioned in the header 'Aznaran - direct', indicating this is likely during or related to the direct examination of ...
|
| Unidentified Witness ('She') | Witness |
Subject of discussion regarding prior testimony about public assistance and the charged conspiracy timeline.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. | ||
| The Government |
Conferred with Mr. Everdell regarding redactions.
|
|
| DOJ |
implied by DOJ-OGR stamp
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Jurisdiction (SDNY)
|
|
|
Location in the courtroom where an exhibit will be placed facedown.
|
"I'm told it was not -- she testified it was not during the period of the charged conspiracy when she was on public assistance"Source
"We reached agreement as to redactions and other omissions from this exhibit"Source
"We'll put one, with the Court's permission, facedown in the witness box."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,444 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document