This document is page 11 of a court transcript (filed March 24, 2022) discussing legal arguments regarding 'ineffective assistance' of counsel and 'waivers.' The speaker cites legal precedents including 'Chappee' in the First Circuit and 'Flores' in the Second Circuit, discussing the 'Rosario material' and '3500 material' (discovery rules) in the context of New York law and federal appeals.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Judge Van Graafeiland | Judge |
Mentioned as having written a dissent in the 'Flores' case cited by the speaker.
|
| Flores | Case Subject |
Referenced in the case name 'Flores' in the Second Circuit.
|
| Chappee | Case Subject |
Referenced in the case name 'Chappee' in the First Circuit.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| First Circuit |
Federal court circuit mentioned in relation to the Chappee case.
|
|
| Second Circuit |
Federal court circuit mentioned in relation to the Flores case.
|
|
| First Department in New York Court of Appeals |
Legal body mentioned regarding waiver laws.
|
|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Transcription service provider listed at the bottom of the page.
|
|
| DOJ |
Department of Justice (inferred from footer stamp DOJ-OGR).
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Mentioned in the context of state law ('New York law') and the Court of Appeals.
|
"It's also under Chappee in the First Circuit, and I would bet it is also effective assistance."Source
"There is no harmless error standard, that's how crazy New York law was."Source
"How can a lawyer possibly having been handed a piece of paper which is a new trial card, how can you not play it."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,618 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document