DOJ-OGR-00020368.jpg

660 KB

Extraction Summary

2
People
4
Organizations
2
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court filing / legal brief
File Size: 660 KB
Summary

This document page, part of a legal filing from May 2021, details the Government's response to Judge Nathan regarding 'flashlight surveillance' of Ghislaine Maxwell at the MDC. It explains that while general population inmates are checked hourly and SHU inmates every 30 minutes, Maxwell is checked every 15 minutes due to an 'enhanced security schedule' and 'heightened safety and security concerns,' despite not being on suicide watch.

People (2)

Name Role Context
Maxwell Defendant/Inmate
Subject of the detention and flashlight surveillance discussion; on an enhanced security schedule.
Judge Nathan Judge
Directed the Government to provide explanations regarding MDC surveillance; recipient of the May 5 letter.

Organizations (4)

Name Type Context
MDC
Metropolitan Detention Center; facility housing Maxwell and conducting surveillance.
District Court
The court overseeing the case.
Government
Prosecution/DOJ; communicating with the Judge and MDC legal counsel.
DOJ
Department of Justice (indicated in footer stamp).

Timeline (2 events)

2021-05-05
Government submitted a letter to Judge Nathan detailing MDC surveillance protocols.
District Court
Ongoing
Flashlight checks performed on Maxwell every 15 minutes due to enhanced security schedule.
MDC
Maxwell MDC Staff

Locations (2)

Location Context
MDC
Metropolitan Detention Center
Specific unit within the MDC mentioned for comparison of check frequencies.

Relationships (2)

Judge Nathan Legal Authority/Litigant Government
Judge Nathan directed the Government to confer with MDC legal counsel
MDC Staff Custodian/Inmate Maxwell
MDC staff conduct these nighttime checks on her every 15 minutes.

Key Quotes (4)

"MDC staff point a flashlight at the ceiling of each cell in order to illuminate the cell enough to confirm that each inmate “is present in the cell, breathing, and not in distress.”"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00020368.jpg
Quote #1
"Because Maxwell is on an enhanced security schedule, MDC staff conduct these nighttime checks on her every 15 minutes."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00020368.jpg
Quote #2
"Maxwell is not on suicide watch"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00020368.jpg
Quote #3
"factors that “raise heightened safety and security concerns,” including the charges she faces"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00020368.jpg
Quote #4

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,564 characters)

Case 21-58, Document 92, 05/27/2021, 3109708, Page10 of 24
flashlight surveillance.” (Mot. Ex. C at 2). That same day, Judge Nathan directed
the Government to confer with MDC legal counsel and provide the District Court
with an explanation of what flashlight surveillance the MDC conducts on Maxwell
at night, the basis for such surveillance, and the availability of an appropriate eye
covering for Maxwell’s use at night. (Dkt. 257).
19. On May 5, 2021, the Government submitted a letter to Judge
Nathan conveying MDC legal counsel’s answers to the District Court’s questions.
(Mot. Ex. D). First, the Government confirmed that all inmates at the MDC are
subject to some form of flashlight checks throughout the night for their safety and
security. In particular, MDC staff point a flashlight at the ceiling of each cell in
order to illuminate the cell enough to confirm that each inmate “is present in the cell,
breathing, and not in distress.” (Id. at 1). MDC staff conduct such checks every
30 minutes in the Special Housing Unit (“SHU”), and approximately once per hour
for inmates housed in general population. (Id.). Because Maxwell is on an
enhanced security schedule, MDC staff conduct these nighttime checks on her every
15 minutes. (Id.). Second, the Government conveyed that the MDC has
determined that, although Maxwell is not on suicide watch, increased frequency of
nighttime monitoring is warranted in her case due to several factors that “raise
heightened safety and security concerns,” including the charges she faces, the
10
DOJ-OGR-00020368

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document