DOJ-OGR-00020133.jpg
500 KB
Extraction Summary
2
People
2
Organizations
3
Locations
3
Events
2
Relationships
5
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court order / legal filing (page 6 of 22)
File Size:
500 KB
Summary
This document is page 6 of a court order filed on December 28, 2020, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330). The text details the Court's rejection of the Defendant's motion for release, despite her offers to pay for private security, waive extradition rights from the UK and France, and arguments regarding COVID-19 risks in confinement. The Court concludes that no combination of conditions can reasonably assure the Defendant's appearance.
People (2)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The Defendant | Defendant |
Subject of the detention order; implied to be Ghislaine Maxwell based on case number 1:20-cr-00330-AJN.
|
| The Court | Judicial Authority |
Reviewing the motion for release; concludes detention is still warranted.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Pretrial Services |
Agency responsible for approving movements or supervising the defendant.
|
|
| The Government |
Prosecution; argued the defendant attempted to evade law enforcement.
|
Timeline (3 events)
2020-12-28
Locations (3)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location of Defendant's family ties.
|
|
|
Country mentioned regarding extradition waivers.
|
|
|
Country mentioned regarding extradition waivers.
|
Relationships (2)
evidence of the Defendant’s family ties in the United States
rebuts the Government’s original contention that she attempted to evade law enforcement
Key Quotes (5)
"the Defendant would have on-premises security guards that she would pay for who would prevent her from leaving the residence"Source
DOJ-OGR-00020133.jpg
Quote #1
"This newly presented information... includes evidence of the Defendant’s family ties in the United States"Source
DOJ-OGR-00020133.jpg
Quote #2
"waivers of her right to contest extradition from the United Kingdom and France"Source
DOJ-OGR-00020133.jpg
Quote #3
"conditions of her confinement, including as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, present an additional factor favoring release"Source
DOJ-OGR-00020133.jpg
Quote #4
"the Court again concludes that no conditions or combination of conditions could reasonably assure her appearance"Source
DOJ-OGR-00020133.jpg
Quote #5
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (2,055 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 106 Filed 12/28/20 Page 6 of 22
counsel, medical visits, and upon approval by the Court or Pretrial Services. Id. at 2 3.
Furthermore, the Defendant would have on-premises security guards that she would pay for who would prevent her from leaving the residence at any time without prior approval by the Court or Pretrial Services and who would escort her when she is authorized to leave. Id. at 3.
The motion also presents new information that, according to the Defendant, addresses the concerns that the Court articulated when it determined that detention was warranted. This newly presented information, most of which was available to the Defendant at the time of the initial bail hearing, includes evidence of the Defendant’s family ties in the United States, see Def. Mot. at 10 14; a detailed financial report that provides a more comprehensive outlook on the Defendant’s financial conditions and assets, see id. at 15–18; evidence that according to her rebuts the Government’s original contention that she attempted to evade law enforcement prior to her arrest, see id. at 18–25; waivers of her right to contest extradition from the United Kingdom and France, along with expert opinions claiming that the Defendant would not be able to resist extradition if she were to execute the waivers, see id. at 25–29; and evidence that she argues lays bare the weakness of the Government’s case against her, see id. at 30–34.
Finally, the Defendant argues that the conditions of her confinement, including as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, present an additional factor favoring release. She claims that the conditions imposed are punitive and that those conditions interfere with her ability to participate in her defense, and she asserts that these factors further militate in favor of release. See id. at 34 38.
Having carefully considered all of the Defendant’s arguments, the Court again concludes that no conditions or combination of conditions could reasonably assure her appearance and that
6
DOJ-OGR-00020133
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document