DOJ-OGR-00011543.jpg
597 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
597 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on July 22, 2022. It details a legal argument between Ms. Moe and the Court regarding the timeline of a conspiracy, specifically whether it extended into 2005. Ms. Moe cites 'message pads' and a specific November 2004 message from an individual named Carolyn contacting 'the house' for an appointment as evidence that the conspiracy was still live during that period.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Carolyn | Subject of testimony/evidence |
Mentioned in message pads as visiting 'the house' throughout 2004 and contacting it in November 2004 for an appointment.
|
| Ms. Moe | Attorney |
Arguing regarding the timeline of the conspiracy and evidence of acts committed in 2004/2005.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Questioning Ms. Moe about the timeline of the conspiracy, specifically regarding 'post indictment' vs 'post conspirac...
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. |
Listed in footer.
|
|
| DOJ |
Implied by Bates stamp DOJ-OGR-00011543.
|
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Place where Carolyn was visiting and scheduling appointments.
|
Relationships (1)
Ms. Moe argues her visits ratify membership of the conspiracy.
Key Quotes (3)
"The message pads show that Carolyn was still going to the house."Source
DOJ-OGR-00011543.jpg
Quote #1
"the conspiracy was still live, and the fact that there were additional acts ratifying membership of the conspiracy throughout 2004 and into 2005 satisfies that burden."Source
DOJ-OGR-00011543.jpg
Quote #2
"a message from Carolyn in November of 2004 showing that she was contacting the house to make a scheduled appointment."Source
DOJ-OGR-00011543.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,481 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 737 Filed 07/22/22 Page 24 of 101 24
M6SQmax1
M6SQmax1
1 that it certainly was. The message pads show that Carolyn was
2 still going to the house. Her testimony establishes that she
3 was still going to the house throughout that time period. We
4 do not agree that we're required to show that any conspirator
5 took a specific act in that exact window but just that the
6 conspiracy was still live, and the fact that there were
7 additional acts ratifying membership of the conspiracy
8 throughout 2004 and into 2005 satisfies that burden.
9 THE COURT: Again, just to make sure I'm not missing
10 anything you want to point to, the into 2005 is pointing to
11 post conspiracy conduct.
12 MS. MOE: Post indictment conduct, your Honor.
13 THE COURT: Post indictment. Is it in some way not
14 post conspiracy?
15 MS. MOE: Well, your Honor, again, the question before
16 the Court, according to the application is when the did offense
17 end.
18 THE COURT: Ms. Moe, I do understand you're framing
19 that question. I'm asking record evidence question. Is there
20 something you're pointing to for your statement, the post 2005
21 which consists of conspiratorial conduct?
22 MS. MOE: I think separate from the 2005 evidence, we
23 would point to in the fall of 2004, a message from Carolyn in
24 November of 2004 showing that she was contacting the house to
25 make a scheduled appointment.
2 still going to the house. Her testimony establishes that she
3 was still going to the house throughout that time period. We
4 do not agree that we're required to show that any conspirator
5 took a specific act in that exact window but just that the
6 conspiracy was still live, and the fact that there were
7 additional acts ratifying membership of the conspiracy
8 throughout 2004 and into 2005 satisfies that burden.
9 THE COURT: Again, just to make sure I'm not missing
10 anything you want to point to, the into 2005 is pointing to
11 post conspiracy conduct.
12 MS. MOE: Post indictment conduct, your Honor.
13 THE COURT: Post indictment. Is it in some way not
14 post conspiracy?
15 MS. MOE: Well, your Honor, again, the question before
16 the Court, according to the application is when the did offense
17 end.
18 THE COURT: Ms. Moe, I do understand you're framing
19 that question. I'm asking record evidence question. Is there
20 something you're pointing to for your statement, the post 2005
21 which consists of conspiratorial conduct?
22 MS. MOE: I think separate from the 2005 evidence, we
23 would point to in the fall of 2004, a message from Carolyn in
24 November of 2004 showing that she was contacting the house to
25 make a scheduled appointment.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
.
.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00011543
.
.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00011543
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document