DOJ-OGR-00016512.jpg

563 KB

Extraction Summary

3
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court transcript
File Size: 563 KB
Summary

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. It details a procedural discussion between defense attorney Ms. Sternheim and the Court regarding the use of digital equipment to simulate a whiteboard for a 'demonstrative' presentation to the jury, necessitated by COVID-19 restrictions. Sternheim asks if a photo should be taken for the record, and the Court clarifies that demonstratives (like whiteboards) are generally not entered into evidence.

People (3)

Name Role Context
Ms. Sternheim Defense Attorney
Advocating for the use of digital equipment to capture a demonstrative for the record.
The Court Judge
Presiding over the procedural discussion regarding evidence and record keeping.
Unidentified Female ('She') Witness/Defendant
Referenced by Sternheim as the person who needs to perform a demonstrative for the jury ('There's an opportunity for ...

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
Southern District Reporters, P.C.
DOJ (Department of Justice)
Referenced in footer stamp DOJ-OGR.

Timeline (1 events)

Unknown (Transcript date)
Court proceeding sidebar or argument regarding courtroom logistics and COVID protocols.
Courtroom

Locations (1)

Location Context
Implied by 'Southern District Reporters' and case number format.

Relationships (1)

Ms. Sternheim Attorney/Judge The Court
Dialogue in transcript.

Key Quotes (3)

"If we weren't in COVID, she would get up, she would stand before the jury with a whiteboard."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00016512.jpg
Quote #1
"It's a demonstrative; it's not being put into evidence."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00016512.jpg
Quote #2
"Whiteboard doesn't come into evidence."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00016512.jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,406 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 761 Filed 08/10/22 Page 29 of 246 2324
LCGVMAX1
1 equipment does not save anything. So I would ask permission
2 that we would be able to take a picture of it for the record.
3 It's a demonstrative; it's not being put into evidence. But if
4 the Court wished it to be part of the record, the only way to
5 preserve it would be by a copy of it.
6 THE COURT: What's an example? Usually you just use
7 words to describe for the record what's being indicated.
8 MS. STERNHEIM: There's an opportunity for her to do a
9 demonstrative for the jury. If we weren't in COVID, she would
10 get up, she would stand before the jury with a whiteboard. We
11 cannot do that under these circumstances. And the equipment is
12 for that very purpose. It's been done in other cases; it's
13 just that this equipment --
14 THE COURT: So it would be like a whiteboard.
15 MS. STERNHEIM: Yes.
16 THE COURT: Whiteboard doesn't come into evidence.
17 MS. STERNHEIM: I'm not saying it's coming into
18 evidence.
19 THE COURT: She can draw on it, but I don't see a need
20 to take a picture.
21 MS. STERNHEIM: I'm only saying if the Court wished
22 there to be a -- part of the record. But if the Court does
23 not, that's fine.
24 THE COURT: I'm sorry, I misunderstood. I thought you
25 were asking for it to be part of the record.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00016512

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document