This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. It details a procedural discussion between defense attorney Ms. Sternheim and the Court regarding the use of digital equipment to simulate a whiteboard for a 'demonstrative' presentation to the jury, necessitated by COVID-19 restrictions. Sternheim asks if a photo should be taken for the record, and the Court clarifies that demonstratives (like whiteboards) are generally not entered into evidence.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Sternheim | Defense Attorney |
Advocating for the use of digital equipment to capture a demonstrative for the record.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the procedural discussion regarding evidence and record keeping.
|
| Unidentified Female ('She') | Witness/Defendant |
Referenced by Sternheim as the person who needs to perform a demonstrative for the jury ('There's an opportunity for ...
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. | ||
| DOJ (Department of Justice) |
Referenced in footer stamp DOJ-OGR.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied by 'Southern District Reporters' and case number format.
|
"If we weren't in COVID, she would get up, she would stand before the jury with a whiteboard."Source
"It's a demonstrative; it's not being put into evidence."Source
"Whiteboard doesn't come into evidence."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,406 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document