This document is a page from a legal filing in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on April 16, 2021. The text argues against the defendant's claim that the prosecution is unfair due to the passage of time, citing the Retroactivity of Section 3283 and the 2003 Congressional amendment which extended the statute of limitations for child sexual abuse. It references legal precedents from the Eighth and Ninth Circuits to support the validity of prosecuting sex crimes decades after they occurred.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The Defendant | Defendant |
Claims that prosecuting her crimes now presents unique fairness concerns (Footnote 13). Based on the case number (1:2...
|
| Congress | Legislative Body |
Intended to extend statute of limitations for child sexual abuse.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Eighth Circuit |
Reasoning regarding statute applications.
|
|
| Ninth Circuit |
Held that Section 3283 applies retroactively.
|
|
| Department of Justice (DOJ) |
Indicated by the footer stamp 'DOJ-OGR'.
|
"Congress evinced a clear intent to extend the statute of limitations."Source
"Congress expressly authorized prosecutions to occur decades after crimes had been committed."Source
"While [the statute of limitations allowing for prosecution until the victim reaches age 25] is better than a flat five-year rule... it remains inadequate in many cases."Source
"Although the defendant claims that prosecuting her crimes now presents unique fairness concerns, there is nothing unusual about prosecuting sex crimes long after they have occurred."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (2,386 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document