DOJ-OGR-00020370.jpg

583 KB

Extraction Summary

2
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
5
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal court filing / government brief
File Size: 583 KB
Summary

This page from a legal filing (Case 21-58) argues that Ghislaine Maxwell's motion should be denied. It details Judge Nathan's previous findings that MDC's security protocols—specifically regarding night monitoring and eye coverings—do not interfere with Maxwell's trial preparation. The document affirms that previous denials of bail and release have been upheld.

People (2)

Name Role Context
Ghislaine Maxwell Defendant/Inmate
Subject of the motion regarding confinement conditions and bail.
Judge Nathan Judge
District court judge whose previous orders regarding Maxwell's confinement and bail are being discussed and affirmed.

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
MDC
Metropolitan Detention Center; facility where Maxwell is detained and monitored.
Government
Prosecution/Department of Justice; instructed to ensure security protocols are necessary.
DOJ
Department of Justice (referenced in Bates stamp).

Timeline (2 events)

2021-05-27
Filing of Document 92 in Case 21-58 arguing Maxwell's motion should be denied.
Court of Appeals (implied by case number format)
Prior to 2021-05-27
Judge Nathan denied bail and temporary pretrial release to Maxwell.
Court

Locations (1)

Location Context
MDC
Metropolitan Detention Center (place of confinement).

Relationships (2)

Judge Nathan Judicial Oversight Ghislaine Maxwell
Judge Nathan instructed the Government and the MDC regarding Maxwell's security protocols.
MDC Custodian/Inmate Ghislaine Maxwell
MDC's decision to monitor Maxwell more frequently at night.

Key Quotes (5)

"Judge Nathan noted that the prohibition on eye masks 'is a generally applicable policy,' but Maxwell is nevertheless permitted to 'use other non-contraband items to cover her eyes' at night."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00020370.jpg
Quote #1
"Judge Nathan concluded that 'nothing in the record plausibly establishes that current protocols interfere with Maxwell’s ability to prepare for her trial and communicate with her lawyers.'"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00020370.jpg
Quote #2
"Maxwell is subjected to only those security protocols' that are 'necessary for her safety and security, based upon neutral and applicable factors'"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00020370.jpg
Quote #3
"Maxwell’s Motion Should Be Denied"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00020370.jpg
Quote #4
"This Court has already affirmed Judge Nathan’s orders denying bail or temporary pretrial release to Maxwell"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00020370.jpg
Quote #5

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,313 characters)

Case 21-58, Document 92, 05/27/2021, 3109708, Page12 of 24
justifying the MDC’s decision to monitor Maxwell more frequently at night than
other inmates. (Id.). With respect to eye coverings, Judge Nathan noted that the
prohibition on eye masks “is a generally applicable policy,” but Maxwell is
nevertheless permitted to “use other non-contraband items to cover her eyes” at
night. (Id. at 2). Judge Nathan concluded that “nothing in the record plausibly
establishes that current protocols interfere with Maxwell’s ability to prepare for her
trial and communicate with her lawyers.” (Id.). Consistent with the attention she
has paid to Maxwell’s conditions of confinement throughout the pendency of this
case, Judge Nathan instructed the Government and the MDC “to continue to ensure
that Maxwell is subjected to only those security protocols” that are “necessary for
her safety and security, based upon neutral and applicable factors, and consistent
with the treatment of similarly situated pre-trial detainees.” (Id.).
ARGUMENT
Maxwell’s Motion Should Be Denied
22. This Court has already affirmed Judge Nathan’s orders denying
bail or temporary pretrial release to Maxwell and accordingly denied her motions
seeking such relief on appeal. The instant motion, which Maxwell styles as a
12
DOJ-OGR-00020370

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document