DOJ-OGR-00014672.jpg
557 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript / legal filing
File Size:
557 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. It captures a debate between defense attorney Mr. Everdell and the Judge regarding how to answer a jury question concerning conspiracy to commit a crime in Counts One and Three. The defense argues for repeating limiting instructions to prevent broad application of testimony, while the Court argues a simple 'yes' is the substantive answer and the limiting instruction is nonresponsive.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Mr. Everdell | Defense Counsel |
Arguing regarding jury instructions and how to answer a jury question.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the discussion, rejecting the defense's proposal to reuse previous limiting instructions.
|
| Jury | Jurors |
Referenced as 'they'; asked a specific question regarding conspiracy charges.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. | ||
| DOJ |
Inferred from footer 'DOJ-OGR'
|
Timeline (1 events)
2022-08-10
Court proceeding discussing jury deliberation question regarding conspiracy counts.
Courtroom (Southern District)
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Jurisdiction mentioned in the reporter's footer (likely SDNY).
|
Relationships (1)
Dialogue exchange in court transcript.
Key Quotes (4)
"The answer is yes, they can."Source
DOJ-OGR-00014672.jpg
Quote #1
"The limiting instruction is nonresponsive to their question."Source
DOJ-OGR-00014672.jpg
Quote #2
"They are not asking what it may not be used for. They have a specific question... as to whether they may consider it for this."Source
DOJ-OGR-00014672.jpg
Quote #3
"to say yes, while technically accurate, allows the jury to then use her testimony more broadly if they aren't given the instruction of how they can use the testimony."Source
DOJ-OGR-00014672.jpg
Quote #4
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,523 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 769 Filed 08/10/22 Page 14 of 19 3105
LCLVMAXT
LCLVMAXT
1 conspiracy to commit a crime in Counts One and Three?
2 The answer is yes, they can.
3 Do you have a proposal for how to say that other than
4 just yes? I'm happy to hear it.
5 MR. EVERDELL: Your Honor, my proposal is to give them
6 the limiting instructions that we got before.
7 THE COURT: The limiting instruction is nonresponsive
8 to their question.
9 MR. EVERDELL: One moment, your Honor.
10 THE COURT: They are not asking what it may not be
11 used for. They have a specific question, I think, probably in
12 light of the limiting instruction as to whether they may
13 consider it for this. And the substantive answer to that is
14 yes.
15 MR. EVERDELL: One moment, your Honor.
16 (Counsel conferred)
17 MR. EVERDELL: Your Honor, I think, as you're saying,
18 to say yes, while technically accurate, allows the jury to then
19 use her testimony more broadly if they aren't given the
20 instruction of how they can use the testimony. So if the
21 simple answer is yes, then the concern is that they would use
22 it and apply the testimony more broadly. And so I think what
23 was given before with the limits in the limiting instruction is
24 how they can use it appropriately in testimony and should be
25 given again.
2 The answer is yes, they can.
3 Do you have a proposal for how to say that other than
4 just yes? I'm happy to hear it.
5 MR. EVERDELL: Your Honor, my proposal is to give them
6 the limiting instructions that we got before.
7 THE COURT: The limiting instruction is nonresponsive
8 to their question.
9 MR. EVERDELL: One moment, your Honor.
10 THE COURT: They are not asking what it may not be
11 used for. They have a specific question, I think, probably in
12 light of the limiting instruction as to whether they may
13 consider it for this. And the substantive answer to that is
14 yes.
15 MR. EVERDELL: One moment, your Honor.
16 (Counsel conferred)
17 MR. EVERDELL: Your Honor, I think, as you're saying,
18 to say yes, while technically accurate, allows the jury to then
19 use her testimony more broadly if they aren't given the
20 instruction of how they can use the testimony. So if the
21 simple answer is yes, then the concern is that they would use
22 it and apply the testimony more broadly. And so I think what
23 was given before with the limits in the limiting instruction is
24 how they can use it appropriately in testimony and should be
25 given again.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00014672
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document