DOJ-OGR-00001062.jpg
633 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
2
Organizations
2
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
633 KB
Summary
This page is a transcript from a court hearing dated April 1, 2021 (Case 21-770), likely related to Ghislaine Maxwell's appeal regarding detention. The defense attorney argues that the defendant is not a flight risk ('opposite of hiding') and contends that the perjury charge—stemming from a denial of guilt during a deposition—should not heavily weigh the 3142 analysis against release. The attorney notes the government has been investigating the case for ten years.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The Defendant | Defendant |
Subject of the detention hearing, facing perjury charges. (Context implies Ghislaine Maxwell given the 2021 date and ...
|
| Your Honor | Judge |
Presiding over the hearing.
|
| Speaker (Defense Counsel) | Attorney |
Arguing against detention and minimizing the weight of the perjury charge.
|
| The Government | Prosecution |
Argued for detention based on perjury charges; investigating the case for ten years.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Produced the transcript.
|
|
| The Government |
United States Department of Justice (implied).
|
Timeline (2 events)
2021-04-01
Court hearing regarding detention/bail (Case 21-770).
Court (likely appellate based on case number format)
Defense Counsel
Judge
Government
Locations (2)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location of a property where the defendant was staying/removed.
|
|
|
Implied jurisdiction based on the reporter's name (likely SDNY).
|
Relationships (1)
Government charges them with perjury; Government arguing for detention.
Key Quotes (4)
"That's the opposite of hiding."Source
DOJ-OGR-00001062.jpg
Quote #1
"They have been investigating this case for ten years, your Honor, okay?"Source
DOJ-OGR-00001062.jpg
Quote #2
"We heard several times that there was a -- that detention should be warranted because there is a perjury charge."Source
DOJ-OGR-00001062.jpg
Quote #3
"someone who denies guilt, who says they are innocent, is asked in a deposition did you do that and says no, the government charges them with perjury."Source
DOJ-OGR-00001062.jpg
Quote #4
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,646 characters)
Case 21-770, Document 20-2, 04/01/2021, 3068530, Page121 of 200
58
k7e2MaxC kjc
58
k7e2MaxC kjc
1 regular contact with the government, is removed in a property
2 in the United States. That's the opposite of hiding. So we
3 think that those kinds of facts, I'm sure, your Honor, if your
4 Honor decides to keep the proceedings open and give us a chance
5 to come on some issues, I'm sure we will have some more facts
6 tomorrow and the next day, all with the disclaimer, we just
7 learned this, your Honor. They have been investigating this
8 case for ten years, your Honor, okay?
9 So let me turn now to another factor that the
10 government made argument about briefly, two more factors under
11 31(g)(3), the history and characteristics of the defendant. We
12 heard several times that there was a -- that detention should
13 be warranted because there is a perjury charge. Very quickly,
14 your Honor, we submit this does not tip the balance in the 3142
15 analysis that the court has to perform.
16 First and foremost, the defendant is, of course,
17 presumed innocent; and, secondly, the allegation and nature of
18 the perjury, if the court has been through the indictment, is
19 someone who denies guilt, who says they are innocent, is asked
20 in a deposition did you do that and says no, the government
21 charges them with perjury. That is not -- other than the fact
22 that it's an indicted charge, they are still entitled to the
23 weight the court would give a not indicted charge. That's all
24 the weight it should be given .
25 Let me turn to another factor that the government
2 in the United States. That's the opposite of hiding. So we
3 think that those kinds of facts, I'm sure, your Honor, if your
4 Honor decides to keep the proceedings open and give us a chance
5 to come on some issues, I'm sure we will have some more facts
6 tomorrow and the next day, all with the disclaimer, we just
7 learned this, your Honor. They have been investigating this
8 case for ten years, your Honor, okay?
9 So let me turn now to another factor that the
10 government made argument about briefly, two more factors under
11 31(g)(3), the history and characteristics of the defendant. We
12 heard several times that there was a -- that detention should
13 be warranted because there is a perjury charge. Very quickly,
14 your Honor, we submit this does not tip the balance in the 3142
15 analysis that the court has to perform.
16 First and foremost, the defendant is, of course,
17 presumed innocent; and, secondly, the allegation and nature of
18 the perjury, if the court has been through the indictment, is
19 someone who denies guilt, who says they are innocent, is asked
20 in a deposition did you do that and says no, the government
21 charges them with perjury. That is not -- other than the fact
22 that it's an indicted charge, they are still entitled to the
23 weight the court would give a not indicted charge. That's all
24 the weight it should be given .
25 Let me turn to another factor that the government
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00001062
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document