DOJ-OGR-00014470.jpg

638 KB

Extraction Summary

2
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court transcript (summation)
File Size: 638 KB
Summary

This document is page 70 of a court transcript (summation) from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on August 10, 2022. Attorney Ms. Moe argues against the testimony of defense memory expert Loftus, contrasting the implanting of false memories about getting lost in a mall with the impossibility of implanting false memories about invasive physical trauma like enemas or sexual abuse. Moe emphasizes that Loftus admitted on cross-examination that core traumatic memories are stronger than other types of memory.

People (2)

Name Role Context
Ms. Moe Attorney/Prosecutor
Delivering the summation argument to the jury.
Loftus Expert Witness (Defense)
Referenced regarding her testimony on memory and cross-examination.

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
Southern District Reporters, P.C.
DOJ
Department of Justice (indicated by Bates stamp DOJ-OGR)

Timeline (2 events)

2022-08-10
Court Summation in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (Ghislaine Maxwell trial)
Courtroom
Ms. Moe Jury
Prior to 2022-08-10
Cross-examination of expert witness Loftus
Courtroom

Locations (1)

Location Context
Court jurisdiction (likely SDNY based on case number context)

Relationships (1)

Ms. Moe Adversarial Loftus
Moe is critiquing Loftus's testimony and credibility during summation.

Key Quotes (4)

"A rectal enema is the kind of thing you'd only remember if it really happened, kind of like sexual abuse."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00014470.jpg
Quote #1
"She said the core memory of trauma is stronger than other types of memory."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00014470.jpg
Quote #2
"Remember that study she described about telling people that they were lost in a mall?"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00014470.jpg
Quote #3
"You don't need a paid expert to tell you that, ladies and gentlemen. It's just common sense."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00014470.jpg
Quote #4

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,630 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 767 Filed 08/10/22 Page 70 of 257 2903
LCKVMAX4 Summation - Ms. Moe
1 the facts of this case. And that's because those experiments
2 are nothing like what happened here. And Loftus was basically
3 forced to admit that on cross-examination.
4 Remember that study she described about telling people
5 that they were lost in a mall? Remember that she only was able
6 to trick 25 percent of the participants about that?
7 But, more importantly, another researcher then did a
8 follow-up study, and that researcher tried to implant two false
9 memories. She tried to implant the lost-in-the-mall story, and
10 also a story about an unpleasant bodily intrusion, a rectal
11 enema. Now, some people were tricked about getting lost in the
12 mall, but no one had a false memory about getting a rectal
13 enema. Why is that? Your common sense tells you that kind of
14 experience is the sort of thing you can't trick someone into
15 believing. You cannot suggest that. You can't make it up. A
16 rectal enema is the kind of thing you'd only remember if it
17 really happened, kind of like sexual abuse.
18 And again, Loftus basically had to admit this on
19 cross-examination. She said the core memory of trauma is
20 stronger than other types of memory. She admitted that.
21 People might forget some of the peripheral details, but the
22 core of the traumatic event, those memories are much stronger.
23 You don't need a paid expert to tell you that, ladies and
24 gentlemen. It's just common sense. You remember something
25 like this.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00014470

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document