HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027720.jpg
989 KB
Extraction Summary
5
People
3
Organizations
3
Locations
0
Events
1
Relationships
6
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Imessage log / digital forensic extraction
File Size:
989 KB
Summary
This document is a forensic extraction of an iMessage conversation from May 23, 2019, between 'jee' (using the email jeeitunes@gmail.com, associated with Jeffrey Epstein) and a redacted individual. The conversation begins with the redacted user sharing a Daily Beast article about Nancy Pelosi and Donald Trump. Epstein replies with political strategy and branding advice, referencing 'DB papers' (likely Deutsche Bank), China, sovereignty, and advising on 'less of deutschland more of homeland'.
People (5)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| jee | Participant / Account Owner |
User associated with 'jeeitunes@gmail.com', widely known as an email alias for Jeffrey Epstein.
|
| REDACTED | Participant |
The other party in the chat conversation. Name and ID are redacted.
|
| Donald Trump | Subject of Discussion |
Mentioned in the Daily Beast link and in the text 'china not trump'.
|
| Nancy Pelosi | Subject of Link |
Mentioned in the URL sent by the redacted user regarding 'impatient democrats'.
|
| Tom Friedman | Reference |
Mentioned by 'jeeitunes' in the context of 'tom friedman like allies'.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The Daily Beast |
News organization linked in the chat.
|
|
| DB |
Mentioned as 'DB papers'. Likely refers to Deutsche Bank (common abbreviation in financial contexts involving Epstein...
|
|
| House Oversight |
Document footer 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027720' indicates this document is part of a US House Oversight Committee investigat...
|
Locations (3)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Mentioned in political commentary: 'china not trump'.
|
|
|
Mentioned in advice: 'less of deutschland'.
|
|
|
Mentioned in advice: 'more of homeland' (likely referring to the US or domestic policy).
|
Relationships (1)
Epstein is giving strategic political/branding advice to the redacted individual, saying 'I think you have positioned yourself perfectly' and suggesting 'your brand with tweaking'.
Key Quotes (6)
"60 days after they get the DB papers."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027720.jpg
Quote #1
"oy I think you have positioned yourself perfectly."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027720.jpg
Quote #2
"policy not individuals. . china not trump."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027720.jpg
Quote #3
"your brand with tweaking"Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027720.jpg
Quote #4
"tom friedman like allies"Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027720.jpg
Quote #5
"less of deutschland more of homeland"Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027720.jpg
Quote #6
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,368 characters)
Source Entry: H\Macintosh HD\root\Users\jee\Library\Messages\Archive\2019-05-23\[REDACTED] on 2019-05-23 at 06.21.07.ichat
Service: iMessage
Start Time: 05/23/19 03:21:07 AM (580299667)
End Time: 05/23/19 06:28:49 AM (580310929)
Last Message ID: 29518
Chat Room:
Participants: jee, [REDACTED]
Presentity IDs: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com, [REDACTED]
Messages -
Sender: [REDACTED]
Time: 05/23/19 03:21:07 AM (580299667)
Flags: 1126401
Is Read: Yes
Is Invitation: No
GUID: 1FB1D854-A563-4238-B200-EA41FEEABCCF
Message: https://www.thedailybeast.com/nancy-pelosi-to-impatient-democrats-weve-got-trump-on-the-ropes?ref=home
Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com
Time: 05/23/19 04:15:48 AM (580302948)
Flags: 1085445
Is Read: No
Is Invitation: No
GUID: E439ADEF-F43F-4BFB-8B5D-52CEE26D1420
Message: 60 days after they get the DB papers. oy I think you have positioned yourself perfectly. policy not individuals. . china not trump. . . sovereignty not sovereign
Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com
Time: 05/23/19 04:17:14 AM (580303034)
Flags: 1085445
Is Read: No
Is Invitation: No
GUID: EAFA727B-5D16-4355-A8A9-C357A5646573
Message: your brand with tweaking . tom friedman like allies. all good. less of deutschland more of homeland
Sender: [REDACTED]
Time: 05/23/19 06:28:49 AM (580310929)
Flags: 1060865
Is Read: Yes
Is Invitation: No
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027720
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document