EFTA00020878.pdf
132 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
5
Organizations
2
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Email correspondence
File Size:
132 KB
Summary
This document is an email chain from October 2020 between Dr. Kimberly Mehlman-Orozco and prosecutors from the Southern District of New York (USANYS). The prosecutors initially contacted Dr. Mehlman-Orozco to vet her as a potential expert witness for the trial of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. After reviewing her CV and materials, the prosecutors canceled the scheduled meeting, stating they needed an expert with different expertise.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Kimberly Mehlman-Orozco | Potential Expert Witness |
Contacted by USANYS prosecutors regarding testifying in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial; ultimately rejected as not the r...
|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Defendant |
Subject of the trial 'United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell'.
|
| [Redacted] | Assistant United States Attorney |
Prosecutor for the Southern District of New York; initiated contact with Mehlman-Orozco.
|
| [Redacted] | Federal Prosecutor |
Unnamed prosecutor for whom Mehlman-Orozco testified in a Daubert Hearing earlier that week.
|
Organizations (5)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| USANYS |
United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (Prosecution).
|
|
| Southern District of New York |
Jurisdiction for the trial.
|
|
| East Bay Times |
Publisher of an article linked by Mehlman-Orozco regarding her previous testimony.
|
|
| Barnes and Noble |
Vendor for Mehlman-Orozco's book.
|
|
| Amazon |
Vendor for Mehlman-Orozco's book.
|
Timeline (2 events)
2020-07-12
Scheduled trial start date for United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Note: The document states 2020, but given the emails are from Oct 2020, this is likely a typo for 2021).
Southern District of New York
Ghislaine Maxwell
Prosecutors
2020-10-26
Daubert Hearing for Federal Prosecutor (approximate date based on 'earlier this week' in Oct 29 email).
Unknown
Locations (2)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location of the Southern District court.
|
|
|
Legal venue.
|
Relationships (2)
Email chain discussing potential expert witness role.
Sender identifies as prosecutor in United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell.
Key Quotes (3)
"My colleagues... and I are the prosecutors in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell"Source
EFTA00020878.pdf
Quote #1
"After reviewing them, unfortunately I think we are seeking an expert with different areas of expertise, so I think it makes sense to cancel our call."Source
EFTA00020878.pdf
Quote #2
"I'm actually very surprised. If you still wanted to chat and share what exactly you're looking for, I'd be happy to recommend someone who might be a better fit."Source
EFTA00020878.pdf
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (3,656 characters)
From: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
To: Kimberly Mehlman-Orozco <[Redacted]>
Cc: '[Redacted]' <[Redacted]>, '[Redacted]' <[Redacted]>, '[Redacted] (USANYS)" <[Redacted]>
Subject: RE: Expert Witness
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2020 18:52:17 +0000
To: Kimberly Mehlman-Orozco <[Redacted]>
Cc: '[Redacted]' <[Redacted]>, '[Redacted]' <[Redacted]>, '[Redacted] (USANYS)" <[Redacted]>
Subject: RE: Expert Witness
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2020 18:52:17 +0000
Thanks very much for the additional information. I don't think it makes sense to speak this afternoon, but thanks for offering. We'll review and circle back if it would be useful to discuss further. Thanks again for your time.
From: Kimberly Mehlman-Orozco <[Redacted]>
Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2020 10:52 AM
To: [Redacted]
Cc: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
Subject: Re: Expert Witness
Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2020 10:52 AM
To: [Redacted]
Cc: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
Subject: Re: Expert Witness
No worries, [Redacted]. I'm actually very surprised. If you still wanted to chat and share what exactly you're looking for, I'd be happy to recommend someone who might be a better fit.
With that being said, I just testified earlier this week in a Daubert Hearing for Federal Prosecutor [Redacted]. I'm sure that you might find the hearing transcript of interest at a minimum, and it sheds light in the content of my testimony. Similarly, the trial transcript for this case, where I testified for the prosecution: https://www.eastbaytimes.com/2017/06/10/infamous-danville-sex-trafficking-case-comes-to-trial-defendant-spyder-featured-on-americas-most-wanted/
Best,
Kim
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 29, 2020, at 10:26 AM, [Redacted] <[Redacted]> wrote:
Thanks very much for sending these materials. After reviewing them, unfortunately I think we are seeking an expert with different areas of expertise, so I think it makes sense to cancel our call. Thanks very much for your time—
[Redacted]
[Redacted]
From: Kimberly Mehlman-Orozco <[Redacted]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2020 8:48 PM
To: [Redacted]
Cc: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
Subject: Re: Expert Witness
Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2020 8:48 PM
To: [Redacted]
Cc: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
Subject: Re: Expert Witness
Sure, that works. CV and fee schedule attached.
I look forward to chatting tomorrow.
EFTA00020878
Best,
Kim
On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 6:48 PM [Redacted] <[Redacted]> wrote:
Thanks very much -- 3:30 p.m. tomorrow would be great, if that works for you, and if you're able to send those materials that would be helpful. We can use the following conference line: [Redacted], passcode [Redacted].
Thanks very much -- 3:30 p.m. tomorrow would be great, if that works for you, and if you're able to send those materials that would be helpful. We can use the following conference line: [Redacted], passcode [Redacted].
Thanks,
[Redacted]
From: Kimberly Mehlman-Orozco <[Redacted]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2020 6:23 PM
To: Kimberly Mehlman-Orozco
Cc: [Redacted]; [Redacted] (USANYS)
Subject: Re: Expert Witness
Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2020 6:23 PM
To: Kimberly Mehlman-Orozco
Cc: [Redacted]; [Redacted] (USANYS)
Subject: Re: Expert Witness
Also, I have some availability tomorrow before noon or after 3:00pm, if that works better.
Please let me know what works for you and if you'd like a CV and fee schedule in the interim.
Best,
Kim
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 28, 2020, at 1:17 PM, Kimberly Mehlman-Orozco <[Redacted]> wrote:
Hi [Redacted],
Yes, I have some time to chat this week. I have availability today or Friday before noon or after 3:00pm.
I can be reached on my cell [Redacted] or feel free to circulate a call-in number.
Best,
Kim
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 28, 2020, at 1:10 PM, [Redacted] <[Redacted]> wrote:
Dr. Mehlman-Orozco,
My colleagues, [Redacted] and [Redacted], and I are the prosecutors in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, which is scheduled to go to trial on July 12, 2020 in the Southern District of New York. We would be interested in speaking with you about your availability to testify at trial. Are you available for a call this week to discuss?
Thanks very much,
[Redacted]
Assistant United States Attorney
Southern District of New York
[Redacted]
[Redacted]
Southern District of New York
[Redacted]
[Redacted]
--
Dr. Kimberly Mehlman-Orozco
www.mehlmanorozco.com
[Redacted]
Dr. Kimberly Mehlman-Orozco
www.mehlmanorozco.com
[Redacted]
Available for Purchase Barnes and Noble & Amazon
EFTA00020880
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document