DOJ-OGR-00010292.jpg
265 KB
Extraction Summary
2
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal court filing (table of contents)
File Size:
265 KB
Summary
This document is page 2 (Table of Contents) of a legal filing (Document 648) submitted on March 15, 2022, in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The text outlines arguments opposing the Defendant's motion for a new trial, specifically addressing findings regarding 'Deliberate Falsehood' and 'Cause Challenge' (likely related to juror misconduct allegations). The document bears a Department of Justice footer stamp.
People (2)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The Defendant | Defendant |
Subject of the motion for a new trial (identified by case number 1:20-cr-00330 as Ghislaine Maxwell)
|
| The Court | Judiciary |
Authority that would have granted or denied challenges
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| DOJ |
Department of Justice (indicated by footer stamp DOJ-OGR)
|
|
| United States District Court |
Implied by case filing header
|
Timeline (2 events)
Relationships (1)
Defendant filed a motion to the Court; Court's hypothetical actions discussed.
Key Quotes (3)
"The Defendant’s Motion for a New Trial Should Be Denied"Source
DOJ-OGR-00010292.jpg
Quote #1
"The Record Does Not Support a Finding of Deliberate Falsehood"Source
DOJ-OGR-00010292.jpg
Quote #2
"The Record Does Not Support a Finding that the Court Would Have Granted a Hypothetical for Cause Challenge"Source
DOJ-OGR-00010292.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (713 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 648 Filed 03/15/22 Page 2 of 16
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. The Defendant’s Motion for a New Trial Should Be Denied ................................................. 2
A. The Record Does Not Support a Finding of Deliberate Falsehood ........................................ 2
B. The Record Does Not Support a Finding that the Court Would Have Granted a
Hypothetical for Cause Challenge ........................................................................................ 8
Hypothetical for Cause Challenge ........................................................................................ 8
Conclusion ...................................................................................................................................... 14
2
DOJ-OGR-00010292
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document