DOJ-OGR-00005557.jpg
288 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
3
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal filing (table of contents)
File Size:
288 KB
Summary
This document is page 3 of 40 from a legal filing (Document 383) in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on October 29, 2021. It is a Table of Contents listing arguments G through I, which focus on excluding evidence of victims' consent, addressing defense refusals regarding motions, and preventing the defense from mentioning previous civil litigation outcomes to the jury. The page bears a Department of Justice footer stamp.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The Defendant | Defendant |
Referenced in section I regarding previous litigation against minor victims; implies Ghislaine Maxwell based on case ...
|
| Minor Victims | Victims |
Referenced in sections G and I regarding consent and previous litigation.
|
| The Court | Judge/Judiciary |
Addressed in headers H and I regarding instructions on what to allow or be wary of.
|
| The Jury | Jurors |
Referenced in section I regarding what suggestions they should not hear.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The Government |
Prosecution team, referenced in section H regarding their motions.
|
|
| The Defense |
Defense counsel, referenced in sections H and I.
|
|
| DOJ |
Department of Justice, inferred from footer stamp 'DOJ-OGR'.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2021-10-29
Relationships (2)
Header I references 'Defendant Prevailed Against the Minor Victims in Litigation'
Header H references 'Defense Refusal to Address the Government’s Motions'
Key Quotes (3)
"Evidence or Argument About the Minor Victims’ Consent is Categorically Inadmissible"Source
DOJ-OGR-00005557.jpg
Quote #1
"The Court Should Be Wary of the Defense Refusal to Address the Government’s Motions"Source
DOJ-OGR-00005557.jpg
Quote #2
"The Court Should Not Allow the Defense to Suggest to the Jury That The Defendant Prevailed Against the Minor Victims in Litigation"Source
DOJ-OGR-00005557.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (864 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 383 Filed 10/29/21 Page 3 of 40
G. Evidence or Argument About the Minor Victims’ Consent is Categorically Inadmissible ........................................................................................................................ 35
H. The Court Should Be Wary of the Defense Refusal to Address the Government’s Motions ................................................................................................................................. 37
I. The Court Should Not Allow the Defense to Suggest to the Jury That The Defendant Prevailed Against the Minor Victims in Litigation............................................................. 38
CONCLUSION .................................................................................................................................... 38
2
DOJ-OGR-00005557
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document