DOJ-OGR-00018866.jpg
547 KB
Extraction Summary
5
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
5
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
547 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The defense attorney (Ms. Menninger) and the prosecutor (Mr. Rohrbach) are discussing a potential witness named Brian before the Judge. The government has decided not to call Brian, and the defense is debating whether to call him despite having him under subpoena, due to concerns about his prior inconsistent statements regarding his sister and the risk of opening the door to prior consistent statements.
People (5)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Menninger | Defense Attorney |
Discussing strategy regarding witness Brian; notes he has inconsistent statements with his sister.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the discussion regarding witness subpoenas and scheduling.
|
| Brian | Potential Witness |
Subject of the discussion; has left the district; government is not calling him; defense has him under subpoena but i...
|
| Mr. Rohrbach | Prosecutor/Government Attorney |
Flags that Brian has left the district as he is no longer a government witness.
|
| Brian's Sister | Witness/Victim (Implied) |
Mentioned regarding inconsistent statements made by Brian compared to her statements.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. | ||
| The Government | ||
| DOJ (Department of Justice) |
Timeline (1 events)
August 10, 2022 (Filing)
Court proceeding regarding witness strategy in United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE).
Courtroom
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Mr. Rohrbach notes Brian has 'left the district'.
|
Relationships (2)
Ms. Menninger refers to 'inconsistent statements with his sister'.
Mr. Rohrbach states 'he's no longer a government witness'.
Key Quotes (5)
"The government has indicated they're not calling Brian."Source
DOJ-OGR-00018866.jpg
Quote #1
"He has a lot of prior inconsistent statements with his sister, your Honor."Source
DOJ-OGR-00018866.jpg
Quote #2
"We understand if we call him that your Honor is likely to allow them to then bring in the prior consistent statements..."Source
DOJ-OGR-00018866.jpg
Quote #3
"We have him under subpoena."Source
DOJ-OGR-00018866.jpg
Quote #4
"I suppose we just flag that Brian has left the district since he's no longer a government witness."Source
DOJ-OGR-00018866.jpg
Quote #5
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,508 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 755 Filed 08/10/22 Page 4 of 262 1709
LC8Cmax1
LC8Cmax1
1 interview, not because we had some other contact with him.
2 THE COURT: So you have a choice to make whether to
3 subpoena him or not. I'm just trying to understand what the
4 decision point is. The government has indicated they're not
5 calling Brian.
6 MS. MENNINGER: He has a lot of prior inconsistent
7 statements with his sister, your Honor. That's the decision
8 point. He said a lot of things that are inconsistent in her
9 prior statements. We understand if we call him that your Honor
10 is likely to allow them to then bring in the prior consistent
11 statements that they would have elicited had they called him
12 yesterday. So that's a decision point.
13 THE COURT: Okay. You have a decision point whether
14 to call him?
15 MS. MENNINGER: Right.
16 THE COURT: Is there an application with respect to
17 it?
18 MS. MENNINGER: No, your Honor. We have him under
19 subpoena.
20 THE COURT: Mr. Rohrbach.
21 MR. ROHRBACH: I suppose we just flag that Brian has
22 left the district since he's no longer a government witness.
23 If the defense ends up deciding to call him, I suppose that's
24 their choice to make.
25 It sounds like the defense has not yet made a decision
2 THE COURT: So you have a choice to make whether to
3 subpoena him or not. I'm just trying to understand what the
4 decision point is. The government has indicated they're not
5 calling Brian.
6 MS. MENNINGER: He has a lot of prior inconsistent
7 statements with his sister, your Honor. That's the decision
8 point. He said a lot of things that are inconsistent in her
9 prior statements. We understand if we call him that your Honor
10 is likely to allow them to then bring in the prior consistent
11 statements that they would have elicited had they called him
12 yesterday. So that's a decision point.
13 THE COURT: Okay. You have a decision point whether
14 to call him?
15 MS. MENNINGER: Right.
16 THE COURT: Is there an application with respect to
17 it?
18 MS. MENNINGER: No, your Honor. We have him under
19 subpoena.
20 THE COURT: Mr. Rohrbach.
21 MR. ROHRBACH: I suppose we just flag that Brian has
22 left the district since he's no longer a government witness.
23 If the defense ends up deciding to call him, I suppose that's
24 their choice to make.
25 It sounds like the defense has not yet made a decision
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00018866
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document