DOJ-OGR-00000617.jpg
558 KB
Extraction Summary
2
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript / legal filing
File Size:
558 KB
Summary
This document is page 6 of a court transcript from Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB (the federal case against Jeffrey Epstein), filed on August 6, 2019. The transcript records a discussion between the Judge ('The Court') and defense attorney Mr. Weinberg regarding the scheduling of the trial. They agree to target September 2020 for the trial date, as Mr. Weinberg argues that 13 months is necessary to prepare for a case of this 'magnitude and scope.'
People (2)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| THE COURT | Judge |
Presiding over the scheduling hearing, discussing trial dates and blocking out calendar time.
|
| MR. WEINBERG | Defense Attorney |
Representing the defendant (implied), arguing for a September 2020 trial date to allow sufficient preparation time.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. |
Produced the transcript.
|
|
| DOJ |
Department of Justice (indicated by footer stamp DOJ-OGR).
|
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Jurisdiction of the court (likely SDNY based on case number format and reporters).
|
Relationships (1)
Dialogue in court transcript regarding case scheduling.
Key Quotes (3)
"THE COURT: With respect to the trial date, I could accommodate either June or September of 2020."Source
DOJ-OGR-00000617.jpg
Quote #1
"MR. WEINBERG: I don't want to have the court block out a six-week time and then come to the court in March and say we need a continuance"Source
DOJ-OGR-00000617.jpg
Quote #2
"MR. WEINBERG: Thirteen months sounds like the amount of time that we would ordinarily need to prepare a case of this magnitude and scope."Source
DOJ-OGR-00000617.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,404 characters)
Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 42 Filed 08/06/19 Page 6 of 10 6
j7v2espC kjc
j7v2espC kjc
1 have the discovery, the subfacial discovery, if you will, so
2 that we could make a comprehensive briefing along the lines of
3 the schedule for motions.
4 THE COURT: That's what I was going to suggest, if
5 there is a time period when you could put it all together, as
6 it were, and there is a lot of flexibility. So I will leave
7 these dates, you know, for now.
8 With respect to the trial date, I could accommodate
9 either June or September of 2020. The issue is not so much as,
10 from my point of view, when you are all ready, but what part of
11 the calendar I block out. So is it realistic to block out time
12 in June?
13 MR. WEINBERG: I think it is -- I don't want to have
14 the court block out a six-week time and then come to the court
15 in March and say we need a continuance and risk a September
16 date.
17 THE COURT: Got it. Okay. So a September date, you
18 are saying, sounds like it certainly is realistic.
19 MR. WEINBERG: Thirteen months sounds like the amount
20 of time that we would ordinarily need to prepare a case of this
21 magnitude and scope.
22 THE COURT: All right. That is fine for me.
23 Just while we are taking care of details, a speedy
24 trial issue or application? Why don't we extend it to
25 September of 2020?
2 that we could make a comprehensive briefing along the lines of
3 the schedule for motions.
4 THE COURT: That's what I was going to suggest, if
5 there is a time period when you could put it all together, as
6 it were, and there is a lot of flexibility. So I will leave
7 these dates, you know, for now.
8 With respect to the trial date, I could accommodate
9 either June or September of 2020. The issue is not so much as,
10 from my point of view, when you are all ready, but what part of
11 the calendar I block out. So is it realistic to block out time
12 in June?
13 MR. WEINBERG: I think it is -- I don't want to have
14 the court block out a six-week time and then come to the court
15 in March and say we need a continuance and risk a September
16 date.
17 THE COURT: Got it. Okay. So a September date, you
18 are saying, sounds like it certainly is realistic.
19 MR. WEINBERG: Thirteen months sounds like the amount
20 of time that we would ordinarily need to prepare a case of this
21 magnitude and scope.
22 THE COURT: All right. That is fine for me.
23 Just while we are taking care of details, a speedy
24 trial issue or application? Why don't we extend it to
25 September of 2020?
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00000617
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document