DOJ-OGR-00017602.jpg
614 KB
Extraction Summary
5
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
614 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely the Ghislaine Maxwell trial) dated August 10, 2022. Prosecutors are arguing to admit the testimony of a witness named 'Matt,' who was in a relationship with a victim named 'Jane' starting in 2007. Matt is expected to testify that Jane told him her family struggled financially during her childhood and mentioned an 'uncle' who paid for things, implying a cover story for abuse or grooming.
People (5)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Jane | Witness / Victim |
Testified earlier in the day about abuse; disclosed abuse to Matt.
|
| Matt | Witness |
Identified as the next witness; was in a relationship with Jane (2007-2009+); expected to testify about prior consist...
|
| Ms. Sternheim | Defense Attorney |
Objecting to or questioning the basis of Matt's upcoming testimony.
|
| Ms. Moe | Prosecutor (Government) |
Proffering the expected testimony of Matt regarding his conversations with Jane.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the legal argument regarding admissibility of testimony.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. | ||
| DOJ |
Referenced in Bates stamp DOJ-OGR.
|
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied jurisdiction based on court reporters.
|
Key Quotes (2)
"Jane told him that when she was growing up as a kid, her family struggled financially and he asked her how they were able to pay for things when she was growing up, and she told him that there was this uncle or"Source
DOJ-OGR-00017602.jpg
Quote #1
"I'd anticipate that Matt would testify that he was in a relationship with Jane in 2007, '08, and '09, and years thereafter."Source
DOJ-OGR-00017602.jpg
Quote #2
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,572 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 743 Filed 08/10/22 Page 240 of 247 399
LBUCmax7
LBUCmax7
1 know, as the Court may recall, Jane testified earlier today
2 about having disclosed having been abused to a person who we
3 are identifying in this proceeding as Matt. We anticipate that
4 Matt would be the next witness in this case who would be
5 testifying about a prior consistent statement by Jane. We are
6 offering that testimony under both prongs of Rule 801(d)(1),
7 and I'd be happy to walk that through with the Court.
8 With respect to the first prong of the rule --
9 THE COURT: Is there an objection?
10 MS. STERNHEIM: I'd like to hear their bases.
11 THE COURT: You have clarity on what the statement is?
12 MS. STERNHEIM: Well --
13 THE COURT: I don't, so I don't know if you do or not.
14 MS. STERNHEIM: I think I would have to parse what the
15 next witness is going to say with the testimony here because it
16 doesn't dovetail as the government is suggesting.
17 THE COURT: Okay. Can you be specific?
18 MS. MOE: Of course, your Honor. I'd be happy to
19 provide a proffer. I'd anticipate that Matt would testify that
20 he was in a relationship with Jane in 2007, '08, and '09, and
21 years thereafter. And during those years, he recalls having
22 conversations with Jane in which Jane told him that when she
23 was growing up as a kid, her family struggled financially and
24 he asked her how they were able to pay for things when she was
25 growing up, and she told him that there was this uncle or
2 about having disclosed having been abused to a person who we
3 are identifying in this proceeding as Matt. We anticipate that
4 Matt would be the next witness in this case who would be
5 testifying about a prior consistent statement by Jane. We are
6 offering that testimony under both prongs of Rule 801(d)(1),
7 and I'd be happy to walk that through with the Court.
8 With respect to the first prong of the rule --
9 THE COURT: Is there an objection?
10 MS. STERNHEIM: I'd like to hear their bases.
11 THE COURT: You have clarity on what the statement is?
12 MS. STERNHEIM: Well --
13 THE COURT: I don't, so I don't know if you do or not.
14 MS. STERNHEIM: I think I would have to parse what the
15 next witness is going to say with the testimony here because it
16 doesn't dovetail as the government is suggesting.
17 THE COURT: Okay. Can you be specific?
18 MS. MOE: Of course, your Honor. I'd be happy to
19 provide a proffer. I'd anticipate that Matt would testify that
20 he was in a relationship with Jane in 2007, '08, and '09, and
21 years thereafter. And during those years, he recalls having
22 conversations with Jane in which Jane told him that when she
23 was growing up as a kid, her family struggled financially and
24 he asked her how they were able to pay for things when she was
25 growing up, and she told him that there was this uncle or
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00017602
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document