DOJ-OGR-00005785.jpg

589 KB

Extraction Summary

2
People
3
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
6
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal filing (table of contents) - court document
File Size: 589 KB
Summary

This document is the Table of Contents for a legal filing (Document 397) in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on October 29, 2021. The filing argues for the admissibility of testimony from expert witness Dr. Lisa Rocchio regarding abuse dynamics and from 'Minor Victim-3.' It also argues for the admission of evidence from an October 11, 2021 Government letter and co-conspirator statements at trial.

People (2)

Name Role Context
Dr. Lisa Rocchio Expert Witness
Subject of Section I; testimony regarding coercion, attachment, victim trust, abuse awareness, and long-term conseque...
Minor Victim-3 Victim/Witness
Subject of Section III; testimony admissibility is being argued.

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
The Court
Addressed in the argument headings.
The Government
Mentioned regarding the October 11, 2021 Letter and notice obligations.
Department of Justice (DOJ)
Indicated by footer stamp 'DOJ-OGR'.

Timeline (2 events)

2021-10-29
Filing of Document 397
Court
Future (relative to doc)
Trial
Court

Relationships (2)

Dr. Lisa Rocchio Expert Witness The Government
The Government is arguing for the admissibility of her testimony.
Minor Victim-3 Witness/Victim The Government
The Government is arguing for the admissibility of this victim's testimony.

Key Quotes (6)

"The Court Should Admit the Testimony of Dr. Lisa Rocchio"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00005785.jpg
Quote #1
"Dr. Rocchio’s Opinions on Coercion and Attachment are Admissible"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00005785.jpg
Quote #2
"Dr. Rocchio’s Opinion on the Relationship Between Trust and Victim Awareness of Their Abuse is Admissible"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00005785.jpg
Quote #3
"The Evidence Contained in the Government’s October 11, 2021 Letter is Admissible"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00005785.jpg
Quote #4
"The Testimony of Minor Victim-3 is Admissible"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00005785.jpg
Quote #5
"There is No Basis to Preclude Co-Conspirator Statements at Trial"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00005785.jpg
Quote #6

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (3,228 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 397 Filed 10/29/21 Page 2 of 84
Table of Contents
PRELIMINARY STATEMENT ...................................................................................................... 3
ARGUMENT.......................................................................................................................................... 4
I. The Court Should Admit the Testimony of Dr. Lisa Rocchio............................................................. 4
A. Applicable Law .................................................................................................................... 5
B. Discussion ............................................................................................................................ 9
1. Dr. Rocchio’s Opinions on Coercion and Attachment are Admissible.............................. 10
2. Dr. Rocchio’s Opinion on the Relationship Between Trust and Victim Awareness of Their
Abuse is Admissible....................................................................................................... 22
3. Dr. Rocchio’s Opinion on the Long-Term Consequences of Abuse is Admissible .............. 23
4. Dr. Rocchio’s Opinion About the Significance of the Presence of Third Parties is Admissible
......................................................................................................................................... 25
5. Dr. Rocchio’s Opinion on Delayed Disclosure is Admissible ........................................... 27
II. The Evidence Contained in the Government’s October 11, 2021 Letter is Admissible.................... 32
A. Applicable Law .................................................................................................................. 33
B. Discussion .......................................................................................................................... 35
1. The Evidence is Admissible As Direct Evidence, or in the Alternative, Under Rule 404(b).. 35
2. The Government Has Met and Exceeded Its Notice Obligations....................................... 39
III. The Testimony of Minor Victim-3 is Admissible............................................................................ 41
A. Background ........................................................................................................................ 41
B. Applicable Law .................................................................................................................. 44
C. Discussion.......................................................................................................................... 45
IV. There is No Basis to Preclude Co-Conspirator Statements at Trial................................................. 54
A. Background ........................................................................................................................ 55
B. Discussion .......................................................................................................................... 58
DOJ-OGR-00005785

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document