HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015871.jpg

1.45 MB

Extraction Summary

2
People
1
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Book page / publication excerpt (evidence item)
File Size: 1.45 MB
Summary

This document appears to be a scanned page (p. 181) from a book regarding mathematics or anthropology, specifically discussing counting methods and the concept of infinity. It uses the Munduruku tribe of the Amazon as a case study for counting without large numbers (one-to-one correspondence). The document bears the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015871', indicating it was part of a document production for the House Oversight Committee, likely included in a larger batch of evidence.

People (2)

Name Role Context
Munduruku tribe Subject of anthropological example
Indigenous people from the Amazon rainforest used as an example of a culture with a specific counting system.
Shepherd Hypothetical example
Used to illustrate a counting method using counters in a bag.

Organizations (1)

Name Type Context
House Oversight Committee
Identified via Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015871' at the bottom right.

Timeline (1 events)

N/A
Hypothetical hunt preparation
Amazon rainforest
Munduruku tribe members

Locations (1)

Location Context
Home of the Munduruku tribe mentioned in the text.

Relationships (1)

Munduruku tribe Inhabitants Amazon rainforest
Text states: 'The Munduruku tribe, from the Amazon rainforest...'

Key Quotes (3)

"Their counting system simply goes one, two, three, four, five, many."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015871.jpg
Quote #1
"No need for pesky numbers or mathematics lessons."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015871.jpg
Quote #2
"Treating it the same way the Munduruku treat the number ‘many’ is the safest thing to do."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015871.jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,563 characters)


181
But there is a second way of counting. Take your apples and put each next to an orange. If they match up, you can easily see they are equal in number. “Look,” I say, “I have the same number of apples as oranges.” This method is more primitive and does not require the concept of numbers, but it is very useful. If I’m a shepherd I can hold a set of counters in a bag, one for each sheep. To ensure all my flock are gathered in for the night I drop one counter into the bag as each sheep enters the enclosure. I don’t need to give the counters number names.
The Munduruku tribe, from the Amazon rainforest, have no concept of number names beyond five. Their counting system simply goes one, two, three, four, five, many. Yet this second way of counting allows them to function successfully, deciding whether two groups of things have the same number of elements, even if there are more than five of them. For example, if they need to determine if they have enough spears for a hunt, each person simply stands next to their spear. If everyone has one, they’re ready. If not, then the empty handed Munduruku simply make one. No need for pesky numbers or mathematics lessons.
This second way of counting is particularly useful when tackling infinity because we are not sure what infinity is. Treating it the same way the Munduruku treat the number ‘many’ is the safest thing to do. The first question we would like to answer is whether all infinite things are the same.
[Image of indigenous people holding spears]
Spears and Hunters
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015871

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document