DOJ-OGR-00018066.jpg
541 KB
Extraction Summary
6
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript (criminal trial)
File Size:
541 KB
Summary
This is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022, during the direct examination of a witness named Alessi. The Court and counsel (Ms. Comey and Mr. Pagliuca) discuss the admissibility of testimony regarding an exhibit, specifically a 'book' (likely an address book) where the witness noted his and his wife's names were missing, leading him to believe it was a later version. The judge sustains a foundation objection and orders the jury to disregard the witness's belief about the book's version.
People (6)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Alessi | Witness |
Name appears in header 'Alessi - Direct', indicating this is during his direct examination testimony.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the hearing, making rulings on objections and jury instructions.
|
| Ms. Comey | Attorney (Prosecution) |
Arguing regarding the elicitation of testimony and logical inferences.
|
| Mr. Pagliuca | Attorney (Defense) |
Thanking the court after a ruling sustaining an objection.
|
| Ms. Moe | Attorney |
Mentioned by Ms. Comey as wanting to address the court.
|
| Unnamed Witness ('He') | Witness |
Discussed by the court regarding his potential testimony about a book/exhibit.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Listed in footer.
|
|
| DOJ |
Department of Justice, implied by Bates stamp 'DOJ-OGR'.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2022-08-10
Court proceedings in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell).
Courtroom
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied by reporter name and case number style (SDNY).
|
Key Quotes (3)
"One is, I saw the date and it's a later date; the other is my name has been removed, my name's not in it, my wife's name is not in it."Source
DOJ-OGR-00018066.jpg
Quote #1
"I'll tell the jury to disregard the testimony that he believes it to be a later version of the book from his time."Source
DOJ-OGR-00018066.jpg
Quote #2
"I don't want to elicit that if your Honor has ruled that I cannot."Source
DOJ-OGR-00018066.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,591 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 747 Filed 08/10/22 Page 193 of 228 869
LC2VMAX6 Alessi - Direct
LC2VMAX6 Alessi - Direct
1 does not want me to elicit. I think what he will say is
2 something referring to the content of the exhibit. I don't
3 want to elicit that if your Honor has ruled that I cannot.
4 THE COURT: Fair enough.
5 I mean, it sounds like he gave two responses to the
6 question, right. One is, I saw the date and it's a later date;
7 the other is my name has been removed, my name's not in it, my
8 wife's name is not in it. He hasn't provided that testimony,
9 so I don't know -- it's a logical inference which you may be
10 making. I don't know it's a logical inference that he would
11 make.
12 MS. COMEY: Your Honor, at this point I'll rest on the
13 logical inference that I think the Court can make based on the
14 record before it. I'll move on.
15 THE COURT: So what I'm going to do is sustain the
16 foundation objection at this point. I'll tell the jury to
17 disregard the testimony that he believes it to be a later
18 version of the book from his time.
19 I'll allow the voir dire, and we'll take it from
20 there.
21 MS. COMEY: Yes, your Honor.
22 MR. PAGLIUCA: Thank you, your Honor.
23 MS. COMEY: Your Honor, I apologize.
24 (Counsel conferred)
25 MS. COMEY: Your Honor, I think Ms. Moe would like to
2 something referring to the content of the exhibit. I don't
3 want to elicit that if your Honor has ruled that I cannot.
4 THE COURT: Fair enough.
5 I mean, it sounds like he gave two responses to the
6 question, right. One is, I saw the date and it's a later date;
7 the other is my name has been removed, my name's not in it, my
8 wife's name is not in it. He hasn't provided that testimony,
9 so I don't know -- it's a logical inference which you may be
10 making. I don't know it's a logical inference that he would
11 make.
12 MS. COMEY: Your Honor, at this point I'll rest on the
13 logical inference that I think the Court can make based on the
14 record before it. I'll move on.
15 THE COURT: So what I'm going to do is sustain the
16 foundation objection at this point. I'll tell the jury to
17 disregard the testimony that he believes it to be a later
18 version of the book from his time.
19 I'll allow the voir dire, and we'll take it from
20 there.
21 MS. COMEY: Yes, your Honor.
22 MR. PAGLIUCA: Thank you, your Honor.
23 MS. COMEY: Your Honor, I apologize.
24 (Counsel conferred)
25 MS. COMEY: Your Honor, I think Ms. Moe would like to
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00018066
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document