This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It contains Jury Instruction No. 32 regarding 'Conspiracy to violate federal law' (Counts One, Three, and Five). The judge defines conspiracy under Section 371 as a 'criminal partnership' and explicitly instructs that Ms. Maxwell can be found guilty of conspiracy even if the substantive crime was never committed.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Maxwell | Defendant |
Subject of the jury instructions regarding conspiracy charges.
|
| Judge/Speaker | Judge |
Implied speaker ('As I'll explain') delivering the jury charge.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| United States |
The entity against which the offense is committed.
|
|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Listed in the footer.
|
|
| DOJ |
Department of Justice, indicated by the Bates stamp DOJ-OGR-00017233.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied by the reporter's firm name (likely SDNY).
|
"If two or more people conspire to commit any offense against the United States, and one or more of such persons do any act to effect the object of the conspiracy, each person is guilty of a federal crime."Source
"Indeed, you may find Ms. Maxwell guilty of conspiring to violate federal laws, even if you find that the crime which was the object of the conspiracy was never actually committed."Source
"As I'll explain, a conspiracy is a kind of criminal partnership, an agreement of two or more people, to join together to accomplish some unlawful purpose."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,540 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document