| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Aznaran
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
McHugh ('A')
|
Professional |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004-09-29 | N/A | A legal deposition is being taken. The page covers the preliminary questions to the witness. | Not specified | View |
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell) featuring the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn. The defense attorney attempts to impeach the witness's credibility by suggesting she has an incentive to lie and questioning her about schizophrenia, substance abuse, and fears of losing custody of her children—allegations the witness denies. The prosecution (Ms. Comey) objects to the line of questioning regarding incentives.
This document is a page from a court transcript (filed March 24, 2022) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Ms. Brune. The questioning focuses on the ethical obligations of a female partner at Brune's law firm, establishing that she has independent obligations to the Court despite Brune's supervisory role. The testimony also references the review of email traffic leading up to the submission of a letter on July 21st.
This document is page 4 of a deposition transcript, likely from September 29, 2004. An unidentified questioner establishes the preliminary details for the deposition, confirming the deponent's fitness to testify and their current address, which is with their aunt and uncle in Jupiter. Several names, including those of the deponent and their relatives, are redacted.
A questioner interviews an individual (M38TMAX1) about their negative response to question 49 on a questionnaire, which asked about accusations of sexual abuse involving themself, a friend, or a family member. The individual explains why they did not disclose a past incident and describes the distracting environment in which they filled out the form.
The questioner asks why outbound flight data is missing. The witness, Aznaran, explains that CBP does not have a mandate to process outbound travelers. They then review the date range of travel records for a person named 'Jane', confirming the earliest is Jan 6, 1996, and the latest is July 25, 2004, while also mentioning a prior search that extended to 2010.
A transcript of the beginning of a deposition, where the questioner confirms the witness's name, current address, and fitness to testify.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity