| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Julie
|
Spouse |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Asha
|
Employee |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Honey
|
Employee |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Narrator
|
Storytelling proxy |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Author attempts to outsource his therapy sessions. | Remote/Phone | View |
| N/A | N/A | Author outsources his 'worrying' about a business deal to an assistant named Honey. | Remote | View |
This legal document, page 9 of a court filing, argues against a defendant's proposal to hire private security guards as an alternative to pretrial detention. It cites numerous legal precedents from the Second Circuit and other district courts to assert that such arrangements create a conflict of interest, magnify flight risks, and foster unequal treatment based on wealth, which is contrary to the principles of the Bail Reform Act. The document highlights past cases where wealthy defendants on private security details violated the terms of their release.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity