An email chain from December 30, 2020, in which a DOJ Attaché at the U.S. Embassy in Paris forwards a Mutual Legal Assistance Treaty (MLAT) request from French authorities. The request relates to the investigation of an individual (name redacted) who was recently arrested in Paris. The sender notes they are already in contact with the recipients regarding Ghislaine Maxwell's bail proceedings.
This document is an email containing the full text of a New York Times article from July 19, 2019, detailing Judge Richard M. Berman's decision to deny Jeffrey Epstein bail. The article outlines the judge's reasoning, citing Epstein as a flight risk due to his immense wealth ($559 million in assets) and international properties, and a danger to the community due to his 'uncontrollable' fixation on minors. It also details items found in his safe, including a fake Austrian passport and cash, and alleges witness tampering via wire transfers and threats.
This document is a legal opinion by French attorney William Julié, dated December 18, 2020, submitted in support of Ghislaine Maxwell's motion for release. Julié argues against the US government's position that France would not extradite Maxwell because of her French citizenship. He contends that under the US-France Extradition Treaty and the EU-US Agreement, France retains the discretion to extradite nationals and, unlike the 2007 Hans Peterson case, would likely do so in Maxwell's case.
This document is a letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office, Southern District of New York, to Judge Richard M. Berman regarding the detention of Jeffrey Epstein. The letter argues against Epstein's pretrial release, citing his history of sexual abuse, substantial evidence of guilt, vast wealth, and high flight risk, emphasizing that proposed bail conditions are inadequate.
FBI FD-302 notes from a July 2019 interview with a victim who met Jeffrey Epstein at age 17 through her sister. She details traveling with Epstein to New York, Florida, New Mexico, Paris, and the Virgin Islands, describing a 'mind control' environment where Epstein paid for her life while subjecting her to sexual assaults, including rape. The document includes descriptions of numerous photographs provided by the victim showing Epstein in various locations with different individuals, including Ghislaine Maxwell and Jean Luc.
This document is a photograph labeled with evidence number EFTA00001916. It depicts two females sitting on a railing or boat at night with the illuminated Eiffel Tower in the background (Paris, France). The faces of both individuals are redacted.
This document describes Jeffrey's professional life as a family office advisor for the ultra-wealthy, his personal background including his relationships with Eva Andersson and Ghislaine Maxwell, and his multiple residences. It also details his 2005 trip with former President Bill Clinton to Africa for an AIDS Initiative and illustrates his role as an advisor with a hypothetical scenario involving a pre-nuptial agreement.
This document is a transcript page from the trial of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on August 10, 2022. It features the direct examination of a witness named Kate, who testifies about living in the Belgravia neighborhood of London at age 17 with her ill mother. She recounts traveling to Paris in 1994 with a man she was dating, who introduced her to Ghislaine Maxwell during that trip.
This document is a page from a court transcript of the direct examination of a witness named Alessi (likely in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial). Alessi details Jeffrey Epstein's various properties, including Zorro Ranch, Little St. James (referred to as 'Little St. Jeff'), a New York home, a Paris home, and a home in Columbus, Ohio. Alessi also describes flying once with Ghislaine Maxwell to Miami on Epstein's first plane, identified as a Hawker.
A legal opinion filed on December 23, 2020, by French attorney William Julié regarding the extradition of Ghislaine Maxwell. Julié argues that under French law and the Extradition Treaty (referencing a past interpretation by Senators Durbin and Obama), there is no absolute rule against extraditing nationals and that the French government would likely execute an extradition decree against Maxwell. The document also cites the 2010 EU-US extradition agreement as further justification for cooperation.
This document is page 31 of a court order filed on July 18, 2019, denying bail or highlighting flight risks for Jeffrey Epstein. The Court notes Epstein's vast wealth (earning over $10 million/year), his international residences (France, USVI), and the lack of clarity regarding his total assets. The judge dismisses the defense's offer of a $100 million bond and rejects the proposal of paid 'trustees' to monitor Epstein due to the conflict of interest inherent in their salary.
This legal document, part of a court filing, argues that the defendant, Mr. Epstein, is an extraordinary flight risk. It cites his vast wealth, including an $8.6 million Paris residence, ownership of private jets used for frequent international travel, and limited family ties to the U.S. The document also reveals that a recent search of his New York City home uncovered an expired Austrian passport with his photo but another name, listing a residence in Saudi Arabia, further heightening concerns about his potential to flee.
This legal document, part of a court filing, outlines the prosecution's argument against granting bail to the defendant, Mr. Epstein. It highlights the lack of detailed financial disclosure, Epstein's substantial international income (at least $10 million annually), and his residences in the U.S. Virgin Islands and Paris, all of which contribute to him being a significant flight risk. The document also criticizes a vague proposal for salaried "trustees" to monitor him and notes that his New York property is already subject to a forfeiture allegation.
This legal document, part of a court filing, outlines the prosecution's argument that the defendant, Mr. Epstein, is an extraordinary flight risk. It cites his vast wealth, including an $8.6M Paris residence, ownership of private jets, extensive international travel (over 20 trips in 18 months), and limited family ties to the U.S. The document also reveals the recent seizure of a fraudulent Austrian passport in his possession, further strengthening the case against granting him bail.
This legal document, part of a court filing dated July 16, 2019, details allegations from an indictment against a defendant for sexual abuse of underage girls. The crimes allegedly occurred at his residences in Manhattan and Palm Beach, Florida, and involved facilitation by employees and associates. The document argues that the defendant, being 'extraordinarily wealthy' with multiple international residences and two private jets, is a significant flight risk.
This document is a page from a legal memorandum filed by the government arguing for the detention of Jeffrey Epstein. It outlines his extreme wealth, lack of family ties, and extensive assets (including private jets, 15 vehicles, and a private island) as evidence that he poses a significant flight risk. It specifically details his property values in NY and FL and notes over 20 international flights taken between 2018 and 2019.
This document is Page 3 of a legal filing addressed to Magistrate Judge Henry Pitman on July 8, 2019, arguing regarding Jeffrey Epstein's bail status. It details Epstein's extreme wealth, including a $77 million Manhattan mansion, a private island in the USVI, and multiple private jets, alongside his possession of three active passports and frequent international travel. The document also summarizes the prior 2005 Florida investigation, the subsequent 2007 non-prosecution agreement with the Southern District of Florida (which the SDNY explicitly notes it did not sign), and his 2008 state conviction.
This document is page 5 of a Government filing to Judge Richard Berman arguing for the detention of Jeffrey Epstein (the defendant). It highlights his extreme flight risk due to his sophisticated financial network, international residences (Paris, USVI), and recent travel history (over 20 international flights since 2018). The document also notes that since the indictment was unsealed, more victims have come forward and search warrants executed at his Manhattan home yielded a significant volume of nude photographs of young women and girls.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022, documenting the direct examination of a witness named Rodgers regarding flight logs. The witness confirms that Virginia Roberts (noted as VR), Jeffrey Epstein, and Ghislaine Maxwell were all passengers on a flight from Paris, France to Granada, Spain on March 8, 2001. The testimony also notes there were multiple other passengers on this flight.
This document is a page from a court transcript (likely the Ghislaine Maxwell trial) documenting the direct examination of a witness named Rodgers (likely pilot David Rodgers). The testimony confirms flight log entries for March 5 and 6, 2001, showing that Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, and Virginia Roberts flew together from Palm Beach, Florida to Stephenville, Canada, and then to Paris, France.
This document is a page from a court transcript of the direct examination of a witness named Rodgers (likely pilot David Rodgers). The testimony details specific flight logs from May 1997, confirming a flight on May 5th from Geneva to Paris with only Jeffrey Epstein as a passenger, and a subsequent flight on May 6th from Paris to Stephenville, Canada, with both Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. The witness also confirms that Epstein maintained an apartment in Paris at that time.
This document is page 92 of a court transcript (filed 08/10/22) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Visoski. The witness details flight routes (Palm Beach, NY, St. Thomas, Santa Fe, Paris) and flight notification procedures involving Epstein and Maxwell between 1994 and 2004. Visoski identifies Ghislaine Maxwell as an 'assistant' to Epstein, describes meeting her in late 1991 when she was 30 years old, and provides her physical description.
This document is the final page of a legal opinion by French lawyer William Julié filed in the Ghislaine Maxwell case (1:20-cr-00330). Julié argues that French law does not absolutely prohibit the extradition of nationals and cites a past letter from Senators Durbin and Obama to support the interpretation that France has discretion to extradite. He concludes it is unlikely the French government would refuse to extradite Maxwell, especially given the 2010 EU-US extradition agreement.
This document is the final page of a legal opinion by French lawyer William Julié filed in the Ghislaine Maxwell case (1:20-cr-00330). Julié argues that French law does not absolutely prohibit the extradition of nationals and cites a past letter from Senators Durbin and Obama to support the interpretation that France has discretion to extradite. He concludes it is unlikely the French government would refuse to extradite Maxwell, especially given the 2010 EU-US extradition agreement.
This document is page 19 of a legal filing (Document 97-22) in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, authored by French attorney William Julié. It provides a legal analysis of the Extradition Treaty between France and the USA, arguing that unlike other treaties (such as the European Convention on Extradition), the US-France treaty does not explicitly prohibit the extradition of French nationals. It contrasts this with treaties France holds with countries like Morocco and China, and compares it favorably to the treaty with Canada.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity