The Prosecutor
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
[REDACTED]
|
Alleged collusion coordination |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
[REDACTED] (Judge)
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 |
DOJ-OGR-00002368(1).jpg
This document is page 16 (filed page 21 of 23) of a defense motion in the case *United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell* (1:20-cr-00330-AJN), filed on February 4, 2021. The defense argues for an evidentiary hearing to investigate alleged coordination between the government and a redacted third party who provided Maxwell's 2016 civil deposition transcripts to 'stir up a criminal prosecution.' The motion requests the suppression of evidence obtained from this redacted party, specifically the April and July 2016 depositions, and the dismissal of Counts Five and Six.
DOJ-OGR-00002365(1).jpg
This document is page 18 of a court filing (Document 134) from the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (1:20-cr-00330-AJN), filed on February 4, 2021. The text argues that the government/prosecutor engaged in misconduct similar to the 'Chemical Bank' precedent, specifically by misleading the court regarding previous meetings with a firm and encouraging an investigation despite protective orders. The document contains significant redactions regarding the judge's specific comments and rulings.
DOJ-OGR-00004797.jpg
This is page 13 of a court filing (Doc 307) from the Ghislaine Maxwell criminal trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on June 25, 2021. The text denies Maxwell's request to suppress evidence, stating she failed to prove a due process violation or justify the use of the Court's supervisory authority. The Court argues that the Government's omission of information regarding past communications with BSF (Boies Schiller Flexner) does not constitute the 'extreme misconduct' or 'willful disobedience of law' required for suppression.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017466.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a manuscript or memoir (dated 4.2.12 with a word count) produced as evidence for the House Oversight Committee. The author describes a meeting with then-President of Israel Moshe Katsav, who sought political and media advice regarding sexual harassment charges and a potential plea deal. The author claims that had Katsav followed their advice, he likely would not have ended up in prison.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017323.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a legal manuscript or book draft (possibly by Alan Dershowitz given the context of House Oversight documents) discussing the Mike Tyson rape trial. It argues that the prosecution and the accuser, Desiree Washington, suppressed evidence regarding a financial contingency fee agreement and Washington's sexual history. The text details how a Rhode Island lawyer felt ethically compelled to disclose the fee agreement despite the Indiana court ignoring it, and claims three eyewitnesses saw consensual physical affection between Tyson and Washington prior to the alleged assault.
Unknown
Statements made by the prosecutor, the knowledge of which is being debated.
Unknown
Letter triggering an investigation into juror misconduct.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity