| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1997-04-28 | Legal proceeding | Examination of Juror No. 5 under oath in the presence of counsel for both parties, as cited in th... | S.D.N.Y. | View |
| 1997-04-28 | Legal proceeding | In the case of Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. v. T&N, the Court examined Juror No. 5 under oath. | S.D.N.Y. | View |
This legal document is a filing by the Government arguing that the Court should personally conduct a narrow questioning of Juror 50 to investigate potential bias. The Government contends this approach is necessary to prevent juror harassment and protect the integrity of jury deliberations, citing numerous legal precedents where courts have similarly controlled such inquiries. The Government also argues against the defendant's request for "pre-hearing discovery" and calling other jurors as witnesses.
This legal document is a filing by the Government arguing that the Court should personally conduct a narrowly tailored questioning of Juror 50 to investigate potential bias. The Government contends this approach is necessary to prevent juror harassment and is within the Court's discretion, citing several legal precedents from the Second Circuit and district courts to support its position. The filing opposes the defendant's request for 'pre-hearing discovery' and argues against calling other jurors as witnesses.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity