Warner
PersonRelationship Network
LETTER.pdf
This document is a legal filing dated December 10, 2015, in which Jeffrey Epstein's attorney, Paul Morris, files a 'Notice to Invoke Discretionary Jurisdiction' with the Supreme Court of Florida. Epstein is appealing a decision made on November 12, 2015, by the District Court of Appeal (Fourth District) in the case of 'Bradley J. Edwards v. Jeffrey Epstein'. The attached opinion reveals that the lower court reversed a summary judgment that had favored Epstein, ruling that 'litigation privilege' does not bar Edwards' claim of malicious prosecution against Epstein.
EFTA00000476.pdf
The document consists of a Cash Disbursements journal for Jeffrey Epstein for September 2006 and a project status report from an associate named Pinto. The financial ledger details significant payments to legal defense firms (Black Srebnick, Lefcourt) totaling over $2 million cumulatively, a $100,000 payment to an investigative firm, and large tax payments to the Virgin Islands. It also lists 'Gifts' to various individuals including Andrea Mitrovich and Thomas Magnani. The bottom document tracks logistical projects including shipping containers to Little St. James ('LSJ'), car deliveries to NY, and construction planning meetings involving 'JE' and Amerling.
DOJ-OGR-00000056.tif
This document discusses legal principles of contract interpretation in the context of plea agreements, citing several court cases. It argues that ordinary contract principles should apply to plea agreements, with a strong emphasis on fairness to the defendant and construing ambiguity against the government, and suggests that the cases of Annabi and Maxwell should be reversed based on these principles.
DOJ-OGR-00000041.tif
This document is a 'Table of Authorities—Continued' listing various legal cases, statutes, and rules. It includes multiple 'United States v. Maxwell' cases, one from 2024 and another from 2021, along with other cases like 'United States v. McDowell', 'United States v. O’Doherty', 'United States v. Rubbo', 'United States v. Transfiguracion', 'United States v. Van Thournout', 'United States v. Warner', and 'United States v. Williams', citing their legal references and page numbers within the larger document. It also lists relevant statutes (18 U.S.C. § 2255 and 28 U.S.C. § 1254(1)) and a rule (Fed. R. Civ. P. 35(b)).
DOJ-OGR-00005906.jpg
This document, a page from a legal filing, provides an academic analysis of the methods used in the sexual grooming of children. It outlines two forms, physical and psychological grooming, detailing tactics such as desensitization to touch, isolation from others, creating secrets, and using threats or bribes to ensure compliance and prevent disclosure. The text cites numerous researchers to support its description of how offenders manipulate children and exploit their vulnerabilities.
DOJ-OGR-00005907.jpg
This document is page 40 of a court filing (Exhibit 397-1) in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on October 29, 2021. The content is an excerpt from an academic paper (page 296, likely by S. Craven et al.) analyzing the psychology of sex offenders, focusing on how they manipulate children into feeling guilt, the role of empathy in the grooming process, and the concept of 'cognitive deconstruction' which allows offenders to justify their actions. The document bears a Department of Justice discovery stamp.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity