| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-02-04 | N/A | Assad regime rebuffed negotiation offer from Sheik Ahmad Moaz al-Khatib. | Syria | View |
| 2011-01-01 | N/A | Lunch at Tabouleh restaurant in Cairo with Egyptian bloggers discussing democracy and US aid. | Tabouleh, Garden City, Cairo | View |
| 2010-01-01 | Legal case | Ahmad v United Kingdom case cited as precedent. | United Kingdom | View |
This document is a page from a legal memorandum filed on December 14, 2020, analyzing the legal viability of Ghislaine Maxwell resisting extradition from the UK to the US. It specifically argues that she would fail to invoke Article 6 (fair trial) or Article 8 (private and family life) of the ECHR to stop extradition. The conclusion begins to state that if she absconded to the UK in breach of US bail, she would likely be denied bail there.
This legal document, filed on December 14, 2020, analyzes arguments against Ms. Maxwell's extradition, specifically addressing claims of political motivation, abuse of process, and the impact of the passage of time. It asserts that it is highly unlikely Ms. Maxwell could establish bad faith by the US prosecutor or that her extradition is politically motivated or oppressive. The document cites various legal precedents to support the view that the public interest in honoring extradition arrangements and trying serious allegations outweighs potential personal hardship or the passage of time since the alleged offences (1994-1997).
This legal document, page 140 of a court filing from April 16, 2021, outlines the legal standard for a defendant to obtain a "Franks hearing" to challenge the validity of an affidavit used for probable cause. It details the three-part test a defendant must meet, requiring a "substantial preliminary showing" of inaccuracies or omissions in the affidavit that were material and made with deliberate falsehood or reckless disregard for the truth. The document explains that a court must then determine the materiality of these errors by revising the affidavit to see if it still supports a finding of probable cause.
This document is page 10 (labeled 'ix') of a Table of Authorities from a legal filing dated April 16, 2021, in the case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It lists legal precedents beginning with 'S' through 'U', including citations for *United States v. Nader* (marked 'passim', meaning cited frequently) and various Second Circuit decisions. The footer indicates this document was processed by the DOJ Office of Government Relations.
This document appears to be a page from a geopolitical analysis report included in House Oversight materials. It discusses Chinese foreign policy under Xi Jinping, specifically regarding the Syrian crisis. The text argues that China's stance against foreign intervention is driven by its own domestic need to suppress separatism (in Tibet, Xinjiang, etc.) and its reliance on Russia to counter Western resolutions in the UN Security Council.
This page from a legal filing argues that Edwards is entitled to summary judgment against Jeffrey Epstein. The argument relies on adverse inferences drawn from Epstein's invocation of the Fifth Amendment and his documented history of harassing and intimidating witnesses (who are also referred to as victims and potential accomplices). The document cites Florida case law to support the admissibility of witness tampering evidence as proof of consciousness of guilt.
This document, stamped as a House Oversight record, analyzes the Syrian conflict, specifically noting the retreat of Alawite supporters to Latakia and the potential breakup of the country. It details a letter dated Feb. 4 from Free Syrian Army commander Brig. Gen. Salim Idriss to the U.S. requesting specific military training (including chemical weapons security) and equipment (armor, night vision, comms). It also notes the failure of diplomatic efforts between the Assad regime and opposition leader Sheik Ahmad Moaz al-Khatib.
This document page, likely from a larger report or book excerpt submitted to the House Oversight Committee, details a narrator's 2011 trip to Cairo. The text describes a lunch meeting with Egyptian bloggers discussing the Arab Spring, U.S. subsidies, and democracy, while also reflecting on conspiracy theories in the region and a past warning from assassinated journalist Gibran Tueni. There is no direct mention of Jeffrey Epstein or Ghislaine Maxwell on this specific page.
Offer to negotiate, rebuffed by the regime.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity