| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
RAF
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-01-21 | N/A | Court Hearing/Arraignment for protesters | Washington D.C. | View |
| 1988-01-01 | Legal case | The case of Beech Aircraft Corp. v. Rainey. | N/A | View |
This document is a page from a legal filing, specifically page 7 of document 397 in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on October 29, 2021. It outlines the legal standard for admitting expert testimony under the 'Daubert' framework, citing Federal Rule of Evidence 702 and numerous precedent cases. The text explains that a court must first assess an expert's qualifications and then determine if their testimony is both relevant and reliable, detailing several criteria for establishing reliability.
This document is page 221 of a scientific text, stamped with a House Oversight Bates number (013721), likely part of an investigation file. The text discusses advanced neuroscience topics, specifically the application of Lyapounov exponents to brain data, enzyme kinetics, and EEG recordings in the context of chaos theory versus randomness. While Jeffrey Epstein is not named on this specific page, the frequent citation of 'Mandell' (likely Arnold Mandell) suggests a connection to Epstein's funding of scientific research, as Mandell was a known associate in Epstein's scientific circles.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity