United States
LocationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
32
Very Strong
|
72 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
13
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Legal representative |
13
Very Strong
|
19 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
12
Very Strong
|
9 | |
|
organization
Iran
|
Adversarial |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
Davis
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Bodmer
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Dreier
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
English
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Boustani
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Torres
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
4 | |
|
location
China
|
Unknown |
10
Very Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Smith
|
Legal representative |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Legal representative |
9
Strong
|
4 | |
|
location
China
|
Geopolitical rivals |
9
Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
Sampson
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Carrillo-Villa
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
Petrov
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
Dominguez
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
Hung
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
Abdellatif El Mokadem
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
Rowe
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
Alindato-Perez
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
Crowell
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
Deutsch
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
2 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Return to Afghanistan to oust Taliban regime | Afghanistan | View |
| N/A | Extradition proceedings | Proceedings in England and Wales in relation to US extradition requests for Ghislaine Maxwell. | England and Wales | View |
| N/A | N/A | Syrian civil uprising and potential use of chemical weapons by the Assad regime | Syria | View |
| N/A | N/A | U.S. involvement in Libya | Libya | View |
| N/A | N/A | Diplomatic crisis involving Israel, Turkey, and the U.S. | International | View |
| N/A | N/A | War with Iran | Iran | View |
| N/A | N/A | Potential military campaign against Iran | Iran | View |
| N/A | N/A | Proposed joint intelligence estimate session | Unspecified | View |
| N/A | N/A | Potential conflict with Iran | Middle East / Global | View |
| N/A | N/A | Signing of an agreement where Epstein acknowledges conditions, waives certain rights, and consent... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | United States subjected South Korea to steel and aluminum tariffs. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Intensification of the trade war between the United States and China. | N/A | View |
| 2025-12-23 | N/A | China hit U.S. with $60 bn worth of tariffs | Global/Trade | View |
| 2025-11-19 | N/A | North Korea's mission to the UN accused the United States of being hell-bent on hostile acts. | United Nations | View |
| 2025-11-19 | N/A | North Korea’s mission to the UN accused the US of being 'hell-bent' on hostile acts. | United Nations | View |
| 2025-11-17 | N/A | U.S. slapped $200 bn worth of tariffs on China | Global/Economic | View |
| 2024-11-25 | N/A | Rehearing denied for United States v. Maxwell, 118 F.4th 256 (2d Cir. 2024). | Second Circuit | View |
| 2024-09-17 | N/A | Judgment entered for United States v. Maxwell, 118 F.4th 256 (2d Cir. 2024). | Second Circuit | View |
| 2024-01-01 | N/A | United States v. Maxwell, 118 F.4th 256 (2d Cir. 2024) case cited. | Second Circuit | View |
| 2024-01-01 | Legal decision | Decision in the case United States v. Johnson, 93 F.4th 605 (2024). | N/A | View |
| 2024-01-01 | N/A | U.S. v. Maxwell Decision | Second Circuit Court of App... | View |
| 2023-03-12 | Court argument | Argument date for the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, Docket No. 22-1426. | United States Court of Appe... | View |
| 2023-02-07 | N/A | Legal case: United States v. Amani Investments, No. 2:23-cr-00014-JAM, ECF No. 8 | E.D. Cal. | View |
| 2023-01-01 | Legal case | Citation of United States v. Montague, 67 F.4th 520 (2d Cir. 2023). | 2d Cir. | View |
| 2023-01-01 | Legal proceeding | Court case: United States v. Nieves | 2d Cir. | View |
DOJ-OGR-00000962.jpg
This document is a page from a legal defense filing arguing against the pre-trial detention of Ghislaine Maxwell. It outlines her background, emphasizing her US citizenship since 1991 and strong family ties in the US to counter the government's argument that she is a flight risk. The defense disputes the government's claim that she was 'hiding,' asserting she was in regular contact with authorities through counsel since Epstein's arrest.
DOJ-OGR-00000952.jpg
This document is page 6 of a court filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) arguing for the detention of a female defendant (identified by context as Ghislaine Maxwell). The prosecution argues she is a significant flight risk due to her wealth, multiple citizenships (US, UK, France), and possession of three passports. It notes she has taken at least 15 international flights in the last three years to locations including the UK, Japan, and Qatar.
DOJ-OGR-00000936.jpg
This page from a legal filing (dated April 1, 2021) argues for Ghislaine Maxwell's release on bond. The defense asserts she is not a flight risk because she voluntarily stayed in the U.S. to fight 'bogus charges.' To alleviate concerns about her wealth and foreign ties, the filing states she has agreed to renounce her British and French citizenships and place all her and her spouse's assets into an account monitored by a retired federal judge.
DOJ-OGR-00000935.jpg
This legal document argues against the government's assertion that Ghislaine Maxwell was a flight risk. It contends she was not hiding before her arrest, but was living openly in her New Hampshire home and communicating with the government via her lawyers. The document attributes her low profile to intense media harassment, citing a £10,000 bounty offered by The Sun tabloid, and includes a quote from an FBI official confirming the agency knew her whereabouts.
DOJ-OGR-00000872.jpg
This legal document, a page from a court filing, analyzes the legal ambiguity surrounding the timing of nationality assessment for an extradition request under the U.S.-France Extradition Treaty. It presents conflicting interpretations, with the treaty and French law suggesting nationality is assessed at the time of the offense, while the Defendant's expert argues for the time of the request. This uncertainty complicates the Defendant's potential renunciation of French citizenship as a means to prevent extradition.
DOJ-OGR-00000846.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from Case 21-770, detailing filings and orders related to defendant Ghislaine Maxwell between July 8 and July 13, 2020. Key entries include a superseding indictment against Maxwell, motions for attorneys to appear on her behalf, and a detailed court order by Judge Alison J. Nathan setting the procedures for a remote arraignment and bail hearing scheduled for July 14, 2020. The order also outlines public and media access to the proceedings via telephone and a limited-capacity video feed at the Daniel Patrick Moynihan Courthouse due to COVID-19 restrictions.
DOJ-OGR-00000814.jpg
This document is page 31 of a court order filed on July 18, 2019, denying bail or highlighting flight risks for Jeffrey Epstein. The Court notes Epstein's vast wealth (earning over $10 million/year), his international residences (France, USVI), and the lack of clarity regarding his total assets. The judge dismisses the defense's offer of a $100 million bond and rejects the proposal of paid 'trustees' to monitor Epstein due to the conflict of interest inherent in their salary.
DOJ-OGR-00000813.jpg
This document is page 30 of a court filing from July 18, 2019, denying aspects of Jeffrey Epstein's bail proposal. The Court argues that the defense's home confinement plan would require excessive judicial oversight and that private security is less secure than actual jail. The Court also dismisses Epstein's offer to waive extradition rights as an 'empty gesture' that no foreign country would likely honor if he fled.
DOJ-OGR-00000811.jpg
This document is a page from a court order denying bail for Jeffrey Epstein. The court determines that the defendant poses a significant flight risk due to his wealth, overseas ties (specifically in Paris), and the severity of the potential sentence (45 years). The court cites precedent such as United States v. Abdullahu to support the decision that no conditions can reasonably assure his appearance.
DOJ-OGR-00000810.jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing from July 18, 2019, argues against the release of the defendant, Mr. Epstein, pending trial. It presents evidence that he is a serious flight risk due to his wealth, international travel, and significant ties to Brazil, a country without an extradition treaty with the U.S. The document also cites allegations of witness tampering made by victims' attorney David Boies and concludes that no conditions, including an armed guard, would be sufficient to ensure Mr. Epstein's appearance at trial, labeling him a danger to the community.
DOJ-OGR-00000808.jpg
This legal document details the arguments between the prosecution (Government) and the defense regarding a foreign (Austrian) passport found in the possession of the defendant, Mr. Epstein. The defense claims Epstein acquired it from a friend in the 1980s for protection during Middle East travel and never used it, while the government argues its existence, along with stamps from various countries and its issuance under an alias, indicates he is a serious flight risk. The document also notes that the defense submitted an asset summary showing Epstein possesses over $56 million in cash.
DOJ-OGR-00000807.jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing, argues that the defendant, Mr. Epstein, is an extraordinary flight risk. It cites his vast wealth, including an $8.6 million Paris residence, ownership of private jets used for frequent international travel, and limited family ties to the U.S. The document also reveals that a recent search of his New York City home uncovered an expired Austrian passport with his photo but another name, listing a residence in Saudi Arabia, further heightening concerns about his potential to flee.
DOJ-OGR-00000789.jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing from July 18, 2019, details arguments surrounding Jeffrey Epstein's bail. It outlines the government's allegations that Epstein's employees facilitated the trafficking of minors to his residences in Manhattan and Palm Beach. The document also presents the defense counsel's counterarguments, asserting that Epstein is not a flight risk due to his history of returning to the U.S. after extensive travel and his willingness to provide full financial disclosure to the Court.
DOJ-OGR-00000786.jpg
This legal document, filed on July 18, 2019, outlines the U.S. Government's argument against granting pretrial release to the defendant, Mr. Epstein. The Government asserts he is an extraordinary flight risk due to his wealth, access to private planes, and the long potential prison sentence he faces. The document also provides background on Epstein's past legal issues, including a 2005 investigation, a 2007 non-prosecution agreement, and a 2008 guilty plea in Florida, contrasting the prosecution's view with the defense's claim that Epstein is not a flight risk.
DOJ-OGR-00000711.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated September 3, 2019, where an attorney, Ms. Allred, addresses the court on behalf of victims. She describes the case as being about power and the victims' fear of the rich and powerful, while expressing gratitude to the court for giving them a voice and demanding accountability for all conspirators. Ms. Allred then requests that two of her clients be permitted to address the court, a request which the judge grants.
DOJ-OGR-00000708.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated September 3, 2019, from the case against Jeffrey Epstein. An attorney representing Epstein's victims addresses the judge, thanking the court for allowing the victims an opportunity to be heard despite the defendant being deceased. The attorney also notes that there has been a suggestion for the court to investigate the circumstances surrounding Mr. Epstein's death.
DOJ-OGR-00000658.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript filed on September 3, 2019, in the case against Jeffrey Epstein. Defense attorney Mr. Weinberg describes the conditions at the MCC and SHU as 'medieval' and 'horrific,' citing vermin and lack of sunlight. He also explicitly states that the defense disputes the conclusions of the medical examiner regarding their client's death.
DOJ-OGR-00000565.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated July 24, 2019, concerning bail conditions for Mr. Epstein. His attorney, Mr. Weinberg, argues that Epstein is not a flight risk, contrasting him with another defendant who lied to pretrial services. Weinberg proposes an additional condition of a credible trustee living in Epstein's home to ensure compliance, in an attempt to persuade the judge to reconsider the detention order.
DOJ-OGR-00000539.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated July 24, 2019, concerning Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB. The text captures a dialogue between the Court and defense attorney Mr. Weinberg. The Court lists various crimes involving minors that carry a presumption of remand. Mr. Weinberg acknowledges the gravity of the allegations against Jeffrey Epstein but argues that his case does not fit the typical profile ('heartland') of commercial sex trafficking statutes (1591) which usually involve servitude, enslavement, and pimps.
DOJ-OGR-00000502.jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing, outlines the prosecution's argument against granting bail to the defendant, Mr. Epstein. It highlights the lack of detailed financial disclosure, Epstein's substantial international income (at least $10 million annually), and his residences in the U.S. Virgin Islands and Paris, all of which contribute to him being a significant flight risk. The document also criticizes a vague proposal for salaried "trustees" to monitor him and notes that his New York property is already subject to a forfeiture allegation.
DOJ-OGR-00000501.jpg
This legal document, filed on July 18, 2019, critiques Mr. Epstein's proposed bail package, arguing that his home confinement plan involves excessive judicial oversight and raises practical concerns about private security. It also dismisses the defense's offer of an anticipatory extradition waiver as an 'empty gesture,' citing the Department of Justice's view that such waivers are not binding and the risk of the defendant fleeing to a non-extradition jurisdiction.
DOJ-OGR-00000498.jpg
This document is a page from a court order filed on July 18, 2019, in the case against Jeffrey Epstein. The Court rules that Epstein presents a serious flight risk and a danger to the community, citing his alleged sex crimes with minors and witness tampering. The document references a statement by attorney David Boies regarding Epstein's history of contacting cooperating witnesses to stop their cooperation, and cites legal precedents (including a 2001 case also named United States v. Epstein) to justify denying release.
DOJ-OGR-00000496.jpg
This legal document, filed on July 18, 2019, details arguments concerning the Defendant, Mr. Epstein's, foreign passports and the associated flight risk. The Defense claims Epstein acquired an Austrian passport in the 1980s from a friend for personal protection during Middle East travel and never used it for international entries. Conversely, the Government argues that the passport, potentially obtained under an alias, contains stamps indicating travel to France, Spain, the UK, and Saudi Arabia in the 1980s, suggesting a capacity for false identities and a serious flight risk. The document also notes Epstein's substantial cash assets of over $56 million as of June 30, 2019.
DOJ-OGR-00000495.jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing, outlines the prosecution's argument that the defendant, Mr. Epstein, is an extraordinary flight risk. It cites his vast wealth, including an $8.6M Paris residence, ownership of private jets, extensive international travel (over 20 trips in 18 months), and limited family ties to the U.S. The document also reveals the recent seizure of a fraudulent Austrian passport in his possession, further strengthening the case against granting him bail.
DOJ-OGR-00000484.jpg
This legal document argues for the continued pretrial detention (remand) of Mr. Epstein. It cites legal precedents establishing a strong presumption of detention for defendants charged with certain serious offenses, arguing this presumption is not easily overcome. The document concludes by highlighting that the U.S. Pretrial Services Department, after interviewing Mr. Epstein, issued a report on July 8, 2019, recommending to the court that he remain in custody.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity