United States
LocationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
32
Very Strong
|
72 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
13
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Legal representative |
13
Very Strong
|
19 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
12
Very Strong
|
9 | |
|
organization
Iran
|
Adversarial |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
Davis
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Bodmer
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Dreier
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
English
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Boustani
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Torres
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
4 | |
|
location
China
|
Unknown |
10
Very Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Smith
|
Legal representative |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Legal representative |
9
Strong
|
4 | |
|
location
China
|
Geopolitical rivals |
9
Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
Sampson
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Carrillo-Villa
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
Petrov
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
Dominguez
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
Hung
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
Abdellatif El Mokadem
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
Rowe
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
Alindato-Perez
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
Crowell
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
Deutsch
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
2 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Return to Afghanistan to oust Taliban regime | Afghanistan | View |
| N/A | Extradition proceedings | Proceedings in England and Wales in relation to US extradition requests for Ghislaine Maxwell. | England and Wales | View |
| N/A | N/A | Syrian civil uprising and potential use of chemical weapons by the Assad regime | Syria | View |
| N/A | N/A | U.S. involvement in Libya | Libya | View |
| N/A | N/A | Diplomatic crisis involving Israel, Turkey, and the U.S. | International | View |
| N/A | N/A | War with Iran | Iran | View |
| N/A | N/A | Potential military campaign against Iran | Iran | View |
| N/A | N/A | Proposed joint intelligence estimate session | Unspecified | View |
| N/A | N/A | Potential conflict with Iran | Middle East / Global | View |
| N/A | N/A | Signing of an agreement where Epstein acknowledges conditions, waives certain rights, and consent... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | United States subjected South Korea to steel and aluminum tariffs. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Intensification of the trade war between the United States and China. | N/A | View |
| 2025-12-23 | N/A | China hit U.S. with $60 bn worth of tariffs | Global/Trade | View |
| 2025-11-19 | N/A | North Korea's mission to the UN accused the United States of being hell-bent on hostile acts. | United Nations | View |
| 2025-11-19 | N/A | North Korea’s mission to the UN accused the US of being 'hell-bent' on hostile acts. | United Nations | View |
| 2025-11-17 | N/A | U.S. slapped $200 bn worth of tariffs on China | Global/Economic | View |
| 2024-11-25 | N/A | Rehearing denied for United States v. Maxwell, 118 F.4th 256 (2d Cir. 2024). | Second Circuit | View |
| 2024-09-17 | N/A | Judgment entered for United States v. Maxwell, 118 F.4th 256 (2d Cir. 2024). | Second Circuit | View |
| 2024-01-01 | N/A | United States v. Maxwell, 118 F.4th 256 (2d Cir. 2024) case cited. | Second Circuit | View |
| 2024-01-01 | Legal decision | Decision in the case United States v. Johnson, 93 F.4th 605 (2024). | N/A | View |
| 2024-01-01 | N/A | U.S. v. Maxwell Decision | Second Circuit Court of App... | View |
| 2023-03-12 | Court argument | Argument date for the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, Docket No. 22-1426. | United States Court of Appe... | View |
| 2023-02-07 | N/A | Legal case: United States v. Amani Investments, No. 2:23-cr-00014-JAM, ECF No. 8 | E.D. Cal. | View |
| 2023-01-01 | Legal case | Citation of United States v. Montague, 67 F.4th 520 (2d Cir. 2023). | 2d Cir. | View |
| 2023-01-01 | Legal proceeding | Court case: United States v. Nieves | 2d Cir. | View |
DOJ-OGR-00016783.jpg
This document is a transcript from a court trial held on August 10, 2022. After addressing the jury, the judge allows Mr. Pagliuca to call his next witness, Special Agent Jason Richards. Mr. Pagliuca begins the direct examination, during which Richards identifies himself as an FBI agent who investigates violations of United States laws.
DOJ-OGR-00016708.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely the Ghislaine Maxwell trial) featuring the cross-examination of a witness named Aznaran, a CBP officer. The testimony focuses on the reliability of Customs and Border Protection (CBP) travel records prior to September 11, 2001. Aznaran testifies that pre-9/11, airline submission of manifests to the Advance Passenger Information System (APIS) was voluntary, meaning CBP records would 'not necessarily' reflect all inbound or outbound travel during that period.
DOJ-OGR-00016703.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Aznaran. The questioning focuses on establishing the age of a person named Jane during two international flights: one on April 15, 1996, from Milan, Italy (MXP) to JFK, when she was 15, and another on June 21, 1997, when she was 16.
DOJ-OGR-00016700.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Aznaran. Aznaran explains that U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) does not have a mandate to track outbound international flights, which is why such data is often missing from records. The questioning then focuses on a specific report of 'Jane's' travel, confirming the records span from January 1996 to July 2004, and referencing a prior, more extensive search that went up to 2010.
DOJ-OGR-00016698.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell) featuring the direct testimony of a witness named Aznaran. The testimony analyzes a specific flight record for a passenger named 'Jane' traveling from Paris (CDG) to Los Angeles (LAX) on July 25, 2004. The witness defines terms found in the log such as ARRLOC (arrival location), DEPLOC (departure location), and explains that the date listed reflects US entry processing.
DOJ-OGR-00016681.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Aznaran by Mr. Everdell. Aznaran explains that border crossing data, particularly from international flights, is collected when airlines submit passenger manifests to the Advanced Passenger Information System (APIS), which then feeds into the TECS database. The witness also states that these records typically date back to the early or mid-1990s.
DOJ-OGR-00016676.jpg
This document is page 193 of a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely the Ghislaine Maxwell trial) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Aznaran. The witness testifies about their background, stating they entered the service in July 2008, attended an academy for four months, and were subsequently assigned to JFK Airport's passenger operations to process international travelers at the Federal Inspection Site (FIS). The witness notes they performed this role for three and a half years before moving to the Passenger Analysis Unit (PAU).
DOJ-OGR-00016675.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Aznaran. The witness states they work for U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) on the New York/New Jersey HIDTA task force in Manhattan. Aznaran explains that CBP is a federal law enforcement agency formed from two legacy agencies, the INS and U.S. Customs Service, and that they have been employed there since July 2008.
DOJ-OGR-00016594.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Loftus. In the testimony, Loftus describes their professional affiliations with several major psychological organizations. They highlight their past leadership roles, including serving as president for the Association for Psychological Science, the Western Psychological Association (twice), and divisions of the American Psychological Association.
DOJ-OGR-00016590.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It features the direct examination of a witness named Loftus, who is discussing their professional credentials. Loftus notes their CV is 47 pages long and highlights their election to the National Academy of Sciences in 2004 as a significant honor.
DOJ-OGR-00016589.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the direct examination of Dr. Loftus by defense attorney Ms. Sternheim. The dialogue focuses on introducing Dr. Loftus's CV (Exhibit EL-1) and listing her honorary degrees from various international universities.
DOJ-OGR-00016505.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, related to Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. Defense attorney Ms. Sternheim argues that a witness must testify via WebEx because they have tested positive for COVID and cannot enter the United States. The Court agrees that unavailability is established and anticipates permitting the remote testimony, instructing counsel to work out the logistics.
DOJ-OGR-00013122.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Carolyn. Carolyn testifies about her interactions with a person named Maxwell, who invited her to an island and asked about her career aspirations. Carolyn states she told Maxwell she was 14, but Maxwell continued to call her to schedule massage appointments with Jeffrey Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00009204.jpg
This legal document is a page from a motion filed on behalf of Ms. Maxwell, arguing that she is entitled to a new trial due to false answers given by Juror No. 50 during jury selection. The central argument is that Maxwell does not need to prove the juror's falsehoods were deliberate, citing several legal precedents to support the claim that even honest mistakes can warrant a new trial to ensure the constitutional right to a fair and impartial jury. The motion criticizes the government's position as a weak attempt to achieve "finality" at the expense of justice.
DOJ-OGR-00009196.jpg
This document is a legal filing by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team arguing for a new trial. The central claim is that her Sixth Amendment right to a fair trial was violated because Juror No. 50, and possibly another juror, provided false answers during jury selection, thus depriving her of an impartial jury of 12. The defense refutes the government's argument that they must prove the juror was "deliberately" dishonest, citing case law that they argue sets a different standard.
DOJ-OGR-00009187.jpg
This document is a court filing (Document 615 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) filed on February 24, 2022. It consists of a printout of a Reuters news article dated January 5, 2022, written by Luc Cohen, titled 'Some Ghislaine Maxwell jurors initially doubted accusers, juror says.' The page bears a Department of Justice Bates stamp (DOJ-OGR-00009187).
DOJ-OGR-00009113.jpg
This legal document argues that Juror 50 should have been struck for cause due to bias revealed in press statements. It cites legal precedent, primarily the Supreme Court's decision in McDonough and the Second Circuit's test in United States v. Stewart, to assert that a new trial can be granted based on a juror's inaccurate voir dire response, even if the response was not deliberately dishonest. The document contends that the key is whether the juror was actually biased and whether a correct answer would have provided grounds for a challenge.
DOJ-OGR-00009059.jpg
This legal document, filed on February 24, 2022, argues that 'Juror No. 50' lacks legal standing and has no right to intervene in a criminal case. The filing references several legal precedents, including Cunningham v. Shoop and Pena-Rodriguez v. Colorado, to discuss juror bias and testimony, ultimately concluding that established precedent, such as in United States v. Stoerr, prevents a non-party from having a judicially recognized interest in a defendant's prosecution. The document also notes that Juror No. 50 did not truthfully answer a questionnaire, having later publicly admitted to being a victim of sexual assault.
DOJ-OGR-00031696.jpg
This document is a job application for a part-time 'Brand Rep/Sales' position at Victoria's Secret, dated August 4, 2005. The applicant, whose personal details are redacted, indicates they have a high school diploma, expects a salary of $6.50 per hour, and lists three previous jobs with duties including 'clerical, greeter + sales'. The document includes fax headers indicating it was transmitted on February 16, 2006, by Dell Riley Kiraly.
DOJ-OGR-00031596.jpg
This document is page 4 of a 21-page T-Mobile phone bill statement dated May 05, 2005. It details service charges for a subscriber whose identity is redacted, showing a total charge of $15.59 for the period. The bill includes charges for an additional line, a text message plan, and various government taxes and fees. The document bears a footer indicating it was part of a Public Records Request (No. 17-295) processed by the DOJ in 2017.
DOJ-OGR-00031508.jpg
This document is a printout of a MySpace profile for a 16-year-old female from West Palm Beach, Florida, with the username 'iloveanirishboi', dated April 4, 2006. The profile's 'About me' section describes her personality, heritage (Cuban, French/Irish), interests, and states she is 'totally in LOVE with zach bryan!!'. The page also lists several friends in her 'Friend Space' and indicates her last login was on March 28, 2006.
DOJ-OGR-00031493.jpg
This document is a MySpace profile for an 18-year-old female from Lox, Florida, with a last login date of March 5, 2006. The profile includes personal blurbs, details about her friends, and a statement that she has already met the person she would like to meet. The page also contains advertisements for various travel destinations.
DOJ-OGR-00031454.jpg
This document is a printout of a MySpace profile for an 18-year-old female from Loxahatchee, Florida, with a last login date of March 5, 2006. The profile, which has been heavily redacted, contains basic demographic information, short blurbs, and a 'Friend Space' showing several friends. The document is marked with a Department of Justice control number (DOJ-OGR-00031454) and appears to be part of a public records request.
DOJ-OGR-00031440.jpg
This Palm Beach Police Department incident report details an interview conducted on October 11, 2005, with a victim who describes her recruitment by a woman named Sara and her subsequent sexual abuse by Jeffrey Epstein. The victim describes being paid $200 for a massage that ended in sexual acts, visiting the house hundreds of times, and attending dinners and parties. Notably, the report includes an allegation that Epstein bragged about purchasing his assistant, Nada Marcinkova, from her family in Yugoslavia to serve as his 'sex slave,' and details a sexual encounter involving the victim, Epstein, and Marcinkova.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity