Norris
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
District Attorney Castor
|
Professional |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-01-01 | N/A | Norris v Government of the United States of America judgment | UK Supreme Court | View |
| 2007-01-01 | Legal case | Norris v Government of United States of America case cited as precedent. | United States of America | View |
EFTA00039019.pdf
An April 2023 email chain between Daniel Ruzumna (attorney for the Epstein Estate) and an FBI Special Agent regarding the discovery of potential Child Sexual Abuse Material (CSAM). During a legal review of approximately 1,100 videos from Epstein's files, co-counsel discovered a video shared with Epstein by a convicted sex offender that potentially depicted minors. The Estate halted the review and reported the finding to the FBI for guidance.
EFTA00039017.pdf
This document contains an email chain from April 19, 2023, between Daniel Ruzumna (attorney for the Epstein Estate) and an FBI Special Agent regarding the discovery of potential Child Sexual Abuse Material (CSAM). Attorneys reviewing approximately 1,100 videos from Epstein's files for civil litigation discovered a video depicting topless women, reportedly shared with Epstein by a convicted sex offender. The attorneys halted their review and contacted the FBI for guidance on how to proceed.
EFTA00039011.pdf
This document is an email chain from April 19, 2023, between Daniel Ruzumna (attorney for the Epstein Estate) and an FBI Special Agent from the Child Exploitation/Human Trafficking division. Ruzumna reports that during a court-ordered review of approximately 1,100 videos from Epstein's files, co-counsel discovered a video potentially containing child pornography (CSAM) depicting topless women, which had been shared with Epstein by a convicted sex offender. The emails coordinate a phone call between the attorneys and the FBI to discuss the discovery and next steps.
EFTA00039004.pdf
This document is a chain of emails from April 2023 between lawyers representing the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein (Patterson Belknap and Hughes Hubbard) and the FBI Child Exploitation/Human Trafficking unit. The lawyers report finding a video potentially containing Child Sexual Abuse Material (CSAM) among 1,100 videos extracted from Epstein's files during a document review. They arrange a meeting at the Hughes Hubbard offices in New York to discuss the finding and hand over information to the FBI.
EFTA00039001.pdf
This document is an email from April 2023 sent by Daniel Ruzumna, an attorney for the Epstein Estate, to a federal agent. Ruzumna reports that during a court-ordered review of approximately 1,100 videos from Epstein's files, co-counsel discovered a video potentially containing child pornography, which had been sent to Epstein by a convicted sex offender. The review was immediately halted, and the Estate sought guidance from federal authorities.
EFTA00038997.pdf
This document is a chain of emails from April and May 2023 between legal counsel for the Jeffrey Epstein Estate (Hughes Hubbard & Reed and Patterson Belknap) and the FBI's Child Exploitation/Human Trafficking unit. The lawyers report that during a court-ordered review of approximately 1,100 videos from Epstein's files, they discovered material potentially constituting Child Sexual Abuse Material (CSAM). They halted their review, contacted the FBI to hand over the materials, and arranged meetings to facilitate this process.
DOJ-OGR-00002115.jpg
This document is page 20 of a legal filing (Document 97-21) in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (indicated by case number 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). It details the 'Practical Experience' of a legal expert named Mr. Perry, specifically focusing on his history with high-profile extradition cases involving the US, UK, and Russia. The document lists specific case citations where Mr. Perry represented various parties, including the US Government, the Governor of the Cayman Islands, and individual defendants resisting extradition.
DOJ-OGR-00002105.jpg
This legal document, filed on December 14, 2020, analyzes arguments against Ms. Maxwell's extradition, specifically addressing claims of political motivation, abuse of process, and the impact of the passage of time. It asserts that it is highly unlikely Ms. Maxwell could establish bad faith by the US prosecutor or that her extradition is politically motivated or oppressive. The document cites various legal precedents to support the view that the public interest in honoring extradition arrangements and trying serious allegations outweighs potential personal hardship or the passage of time since the alleged offences (1994-1997).
DOJ-OGR-00002101.jpg
This document is page 6 of 29 from a legal filing in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on December 14, 2020. It outlines the legal framework and procedural hurdles for appealing extradition in the United Kingdom under the Extradition Act 2003, noting the specific roles of the Secretary of State, High Court, and Supreme Court. The text emphasizes the rarity of successful appeals to the Supreme Court or the European Court of Human Rights in extradition cases.
DOJ-OGR-00031536.jpg
This document is a printout of a webpage from New York Social Diary, dated April 20, 2004. It features photographs of various individuals at a social event, most notably showing known Jeffrey Epstein associates Nadia Marcinkova, Sarah Kellen, and Teela Davies posing together in one photograph. The document was processed as part of a DOJ Public Records Request.
DOJ-OGR-00004825.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) containing a historical press release or statement by District Attorney Castor regarding the investigation into Bill Cosby. The text details the chain of custody for the complaint (Canada to Philadelphia to Cheltenham), the cooperation of all parties, and the subsequent investigation including a search of Cosby's home. Ultimately, DA Castor announces the decision to decline criminal charges due to insufficient admissible evidence to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, while noting that a civil action remains possible.
Request for involvement
Request for DA office to become involved in the investigation.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity