This document, marked as a House Oversight record, draws parallels between private military contractor Erik Prince (Blackwater) and Osama Bin Laden as intelligence assets. It details the controversial legal defense of Jeffrey Epstein by Ken Starr and others, specifically highlighting the sweeping immunity granted by the Southern District of Florida non-prosecution agreement. The text explicitly suggests Epstein's light sentence is best explained by the use of children for 'government-sponsored sexual blackmail.'
The document appears to be a composite of notes or a draft correspondence from a House Oversight file (stamped 017599). It begins by detailing a legal complaint (McGuire v. IBM) alleging a cover-up and child exploitation involving the Gunther family and IBM, before transitioning into a letter addressed to the Washington Post criticizing Kenneth Starr. The author attacks Starr's credibility by highlighting his legal representation of Blackwater regarding the Fallujah ambush and his role as attorney for 'convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein.'
This document analyzes the deteriorating political stability in Iraq, highlighting Prime Minister Maliki's attempts to form a majoritarian government and the resulting marginalization of Sunni leaders. It draws parallels between recent violence against protesters in Fallujah and the 2006 Askariya shrine bombing, emphasizing the pivotal role of Anbari tribal leaders over traditional politicians. Additionally, it notes Tehran's influence in reunifying Shiite factions, specifically the Sadrists, which may exacerbate sectarian tensions.
This document outlines Kenneth Starr's legal defense of Blackwater regarding the 2004 Fallujah Ambush and his role in securing a non-prosecution agreement for Jeffrey Epstein. It draws parallels between intelligence assets like Erik Prince and Bin Laden, suggesting government complicity in using such figures for operations outside standard political restrictions.
This document appears to be a page from a House Oversight investigation file (stamped HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015012) containing research notes or a draft report. It juxtaposes the operations of private military contractor Blackwater (Erik Prince) with the legal defense of Jeffrey Epstein, suggesting a theme of government complicity or utilization of 'assets' for illicit purposes. The text specifically alleges that Epstein's lenient sentence and non-prosecution agreement were related to 'government-sponsored sexual blackmail' and draws parallels between Erik Prince and Osama Bin Laden as intelligence assets.
This document appears to be a page from a larger submission to the House Oversight Committee (marked HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015011). It contains allegations against John and Avery Gunther regarding a cover-up for IBM and abuse of their children, alongside complaints about the NSF and the 'Deep State.' The second half of the document is a letter to the Washington Post criticizing Kenneth Starr for his representation of Blackwater and Jeffrey Epstein, while questioning the focus of the original Starr Report.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity