District of New Mexico
LocationRelationship Network
DOJ-OGR-00014860.jpg
This document is page 10 of a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on December 2, 2024. It argues that Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) was limited solely to the Southern District of Florida and does not prevent the USAO-SDNY from prosecuting Ghislaine Maxwell. The text cites the 'Annabi' precedent to support the conclusion that the agreement does not bind other districts.
DOJ-OGR-00001293.jpg
This document is page 3 of a legal filing (Case 1:17-cr-02949-MV) from the District of New Mexico, dated February 5, 2021. It discusses the prolonged pretrial custody of a Mr. Robertson due to COVID-19 related court suspensions and details the turnover of his legal defense team. The text also references a motion for release based on Robertson's compromised immune system and the proposal of his father as a custodian.
DOJ-OGR-00001292.jpg
This legal document, a Memorandum Opinion and Order, outlines the background of a criminal case against Mr. Robertson. He is charged with multiple felonies, including obstruction of justice for allegedly shooting an informant, D.S., in September 2017. The document notes that Robertson has been in pretrial detention for over three years and that his trial, originally set for March 2020, was postponed due to the COVID-19 pandemic and is now scheduled for April 5, 2021.
DOJ-OGR-00001290.jpg
This document is the cover page for Exhibit N, a "Memorandum Opinion and Order" (Doc. 306) from the legal case of United States v. Dashawn Robertson in the District of New Mexico (Case Number 17-cr-02949-MV1). The document was filed on April 1, 2021, as part of a separate case filing (Case 21-770, Document 20-3).
DOJ-OGR-00000011.jpg
This page from a legal filing (likely an appellate opinion) rejects Ghislaine Maxwell's argument that Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) prevents her prosecution in the Southern District of New York (SDNY). The court cites *United States v. Annabi* to conclude that the NPA was expressly limited to the Southern District of Florida and did not bind other districts like SDNY. Footnotes discuss legal precedents regarding plea agreements and double jeopardy.
DOJ-OGR-00021887.jpg
This document is page 10 of a legal filing (dated December 2, 2024) related to the appeal of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 22-1426). The text argues that the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) signed by Jeffrey Epstein was geographically limited to the Southern District of Florida and does not bind the Southern District of New York (USAO-SDNY) or prevent them from prosecuting Maxwell. It cites the legal precedent 'United States v. Annabi' to support the claim that plea agreements do not automatically bind other districts unless affirmatively stated.
DOJ-OGR-00021804.jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing, argues that a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) made with Epstein does not prevent the prosecution of Maxwell by the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USAO-SDNY). The document asserts that the NPA's scope was explicitly limited to the Southern District of Florida and did not bind other districts. It cites legal precedents, such as United States v. Annabi, to support the conclusion that Maxwell's prosecution can proceed.
DOJ-OGR-00019862.jpg
This document is a signature page and Certificate of Service for a legal filing submitted by David Oscar Markus of Markus/Moss PLLC on April 1, 2021. It includes a citation for a separate case, 'United States v. Dashawn Robertson' (District of New Mexico), likely referenced as case law or an exhibit within the larger filing. The document bears a Department of Justice Bates stamp (DOJ-OGR-00019862).
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity