Dag
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Hugh Hurwitz
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Government's Trial Team
|
Internal disagreement separation |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
AG
|
Professional |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Filing of motion to unseal grand jury materials | Court | View |
| 2020-11-05 | N/A | DAG Meeting Case Overview | Unknown | View |
| 2019-08-16 | N/A | Meeting involving the AG and DAG to discuss matters related to Epstein and the MCC. | Unknown | View |
| 2019-03-13 | N/A | Date of JE status memo created for AG and DAG | N/A | View |
| 2008-05-28 | N/A | Acosta presentation to DAG regarding case delays. | Unknown | View |
EFTA00037867.pdf
This document is an email dated August 15, 2019, from a Detective on the NYPD/FBI Child Exploitation Human Trafficking Task Force to an FBI agent in New York. The email transmits an attachment titled 'DAG_brief.docx' (likely referring to the Deputy Attorney General), sent five days after Jeffrey Epstein's death.
EFTA00022622.pdf
An email dated August 13, 2019 (three days after Jeffrey Epstein's death), discussing an upcoming meeting on Friday involving the Attorney General (AG) and Deputy Attorney General (DAG). The sender confirms that the agenda should include 'matters related to Epstein and the MCC'. Another agenda item is redacted.
EFTA00022617.pdf
An email chain from August 5, 2019, within the SDNY US Attorney's Office regarding preparation for a briefing the US Attorney ('Geoff') is scheduled to give to the Attorney General the following week. The discussion involves collecting and updating 'brass memos' (briefing documents) for specific cases, one of which is redacted but likely refers to the Epstein investigation given the context of the document release. The correspondence references attachments including filenames containing 'GSB' (Geoffrey S. Berman) and 'recused'.
EFTA00020321.pdf
This document is an email thread between officials at the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS) dated April 26, 2019. The correspondence concerns the circulation of a status memo regarding Jeffrey Epstein intended for the Attorney General and Deputy Attorney General, originally dated March 13, 2019. The emails also reference the controversial Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) from the Florida prosecution and discuss providing updates on the investigation's progress since March 2019.
EFTA00013916.pdf
This document is an email chain from May 2008 between FBI agents and USAFLS attorneys discussing the prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein. Key topics include frustration over delays caused by Epstein's defense team, the presentation of arguments to the Deputy Attorney General (DAG) by Acosta to prevent further stalling, and the urgency created by expiring statutes of limitations and grand jury terms. The emails reveal that investigators had identified over 20 known child victims, one of whom confirmed telling Epstein she was 14 or 15, to which he allegedly replied he did not care about age. The correspondence also mentions a plea deal reduction from 2 years to 18 months and concerns about private investigators harassing victims.
DOJ-OGR-00015155.jpg
This document is a legal filing (Page 23 of 31) arguing against a Government motion to unseal grand jury materials in the Ghislaine Maxwell case. The text highlights procedural irregularities, noting that the motion was filed solely by the Deputy Attorney General (DAG) without the support of the local U.S. Attorney's Office or the trial team familiar with the case. It further criticizes the Government for failing to notify Epstein and Maxwell's victims in advance and for demonstrating a lack of familiarity with the trial record.
DOJ-OGR-00015142.jpg
This document, filed on August 11, 2025, details the procedural timeline regarding the unsealing of grand jury transcripts and exhibits in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. It outlines communications between the Court, the Government, and Maxwell between July 29 and August 5, 2025, specifically noting Maxwell's opposition to unsealing the transcripts and the Government's efforts to notify victims.
DOJ-OGR-00025492.jpg
This document is an email from Hugh Hurwitz to Ray Ormond, forwarding a request from the Deputy Attorney General's office (DAG). The original request, from the OAG, asks for verification of a timeline of events leading up to Jeffrey Epstein's death at MCC-New York in August 2019. The email also questions whether there is any reason the timeline information should not be released to the public.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023355.jpg
This document contains an email thread and associated notes regarding the management of complex business and personal affairs, likely for a high-net-worth individual. The text outlines significant organizational disarray, including the lack of an accounting system, staffing issues (hiring/firing), and coordination problems with outside counsel (Paul Weiss, etc.). Specific tasks mentioned include plane and boat expenses, art sales (Picasso), tax audits, and a fee dispute between the sender and Melanie Spinella regarding 'after care' work.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023354.jpg
This document contains a series of notes and emails discussing the disorganized state of financial, legal, and asset management for an entity or individual, likely Jeffrey Epstein. It details a chaotic review of investments, taxes, and expenses, criticizes current legal strategies and invoicing, and recounts a history of poor oversight by previous staff members. The text lists numerous law firms, accounting tasks, and specific assets like planes, boats, and art requiring attention.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023304.jpg
The document contains a detailed list of financial, legal, and administrative tasks regarding trusts, investments, and office management, followed by two emails mainly criticizing the management of a family office. The first email to 'Leon' highlights unresolved issues and staff conflicts, while the second email to Jeffrey Epstein complains about an employee named Brad's incompetence during a transaction.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023279.jpg
This document contains notes and an email chain dated May 18, 2015, sent to Jeffrey Epstein (using the alias jeevacation@gmail.com) and his associates. The content outlines a massive 'brain dump' of financial and legal tasks, including rationalizing over 100 bank accounts, overseeing brokerage accounts at major banks (JPM, DB, GS), dealing with IRS/SEC oversight, and managing assets like art (Picasso, Calder), planes, and boats. The text highlights significant disorganization, noting a 'convoluted' corporate structure, unreviewed invoices, and the fact that the subject is 'sitting on over 100 m of cash.'
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023222.jpg
This document contains an email thread from 2015, likely between Jeffrey Epstein and Leon Black (via assistant Melanie Spinella), discussing the complex setup and management of a family office. The text details extensive tax planning strategies (GRATs, trusts), asset management (art, real estate, planes, boats), and the consolidation of legal and financial advisors (Paul Weiss, Apollo in-house, JPM, GS). It highlights the scale of financial operations, mentioning over $100 million in cash and the rationalization of numerous bank accounts and entities.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023221.jpg
This document contains notes and an email printed on May 18, 2015, sent to Jeffrey Epstein and Melanie Spinella. The text outlines significant financial transactions, including a $20 million payment to the FTC and a $10 million payment to Gratitude America. The body of the email is a critique of the chaotic state of Epstein's financial and office management, citing incompetence by former staff (Eileen and Tom), a lack of accounting systems for over 100 bank accounts, and the need for new professional hires to manage assets including planes, boats, and real estate.
Motion to Unseal
A 3.5 page motion to unseal grand jury materials filed without supporting docs.
No Subject
An inquiry asking Hugh/Ray to verify a timeline of events regarding Epstein and to advise if there is any reason the information should not be released publicly.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity