Riverside Cty.
LocationRelationship Network
DOJ-OGR-00001521.jpg
This legal document, filed on July 6, 2020, is a court order concerning the initial appearance and removal hearing for defendant Ghislaine Maxwell. The court justifies holding the hearing via video, citing COVID-19 related standing orders, and finds that this method constitutes a partial, rather than total, closure of proceedings. The court concludes that public and press access is maintained, satisfying the constitutional rights of the defendant and the public.
DOJ-OGR-00019224.jpg
This legal document, filed on July 2, 2020, is a court order concerning the initial appearance and removal hearing for defendant Ghislaine Maxwell. The court details its decision to hold the hearing via video, justifying it as a partial, rather than total, closure of proceedings. It references its own Standing Orders related to the COVID-19 outbreak and cites legal precedents to affirm that it has considered the defendant's Sixth Amendment rights and the public's First Amendment rights to access.
DOJ-OGR-00019194.jpg
This document is a court order from July 2, 2020, concerning the initial appearance and removal hearing for defendant Ghislaine Maxwell. The court justifies its decision to hold the hearing via video, considering the defendant's Sixth Amendment rights and the public's First Amendment rights to access. It concludes that a video hearing constitutes a partial, rather than total, closure of proceedings, ensuring public access is maintained.
DOJ-OGR-00009164.jpg
This legal document, filed on February 24, 2022, discusses a motion by Juror 50 to obtain his own jury questionnaire and voir dire testimony transcript. The defendant opposes the request, framing it as a 'discovery request' that would prejudice an 'investigation' into the juror's conduct. The Government argues that Juror 50 is not a defendant seeking discovery and that the privacy concerns for sealing such documents do not apply to the juror himself.
DOJ-OGR-00005270.jpg
This document is page 2 of a legal filing (Document 362) from the United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell case (1:20-cr-00330), filed on October 20, 2021. The text argues for public access to the jury selection process (voir dire) and juror questionnaires, citing numerous legal precedents including United States v. Shkreli and Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court. It asserts that First Amendment rights require these proceedings and documents to be presumptively open to the press and public.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity