U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York
OrganizationRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 |
007.pdf
This document is a legal memorandum filed on November 20, 2019, in the Southern District of New York, supporting a motion for 'Jane Doe 1000' to proceed anonymously in her civil suit against the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. The plaintiff alleges she was sexually trafficked and abused by Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, detailing forced sexual acts and the use of sex toys. The motion argues that anonymity is necessary to protect the plaintiff from severe emotional distress, public scrutiny, and potential retaliation from Maxwell, who was described as being 'at large' at the time of the filing.
EFTA00022091.pdf
This Opinion & Order from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York addresses multiple pretrial motions filed by defendant Ghislaine Maxwell. Judge Alison J. Nathan denies most of the motions, including those seeking dismissal based on Jeffrey Epstein's non-prosecution agreement, statute of limitations, and pre-indictment delay, but grants the motion to sever the perjury counts for a separate trial.
DOJ-OGR-00000121.tif
This document is an excerpt from a legal ruling or report, discussing the scope and binding nature of a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) involving Epstein. It addresses the argument that the NPA might bind other judicial districts and concludes that it only binds the U.S. Attorney's office where it was signed, specifically stating it does not bind the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York.
DOJ-OGR-00000119.tif
This document is an excerpt from a legal analysis concerning the binding nature of non-prosecution agreements (NPAs) on different U.S. Attorney's offices. It discusses whether an NPA entered into by the Southern District of Florida could bind the Southern District of New York, concluding it did not based on Second Circuit precedent. The text cites several court cases, including Santobello v. New York, United States v. Ready, United States v. Annabi, United States v. Salameh, and United States v. Gonzalez, to support its legal arguments regarding contract principles and the interpretation of plea agreements.
DOJ-OGR-00000118.tif
This document details aspects of Jeffrey Epstein's non-prosecution agreement (NPA) in Florida, where he pleaded guilty to soliciting minors for prostitution and served 18 months in jail. The NPA included a controversial provision where the U.S. Attorney's Office agreed not to charge Epstein federally or his 'potential co-conspirators,' a point criticized by the OPR as 'poor judgment.' The document also discusses Ghislaine Maxwell's contention that the NPA bars her prosecution as Epstein's co-conspirator, a claim the Court rejects based on Second Circuit precedent and the scope of the NPA.
DOJ-OGR-00020763.jpg
This legal document, filed on April 16, 2021, argues that a non-prosecution agreement (NPA) does not bind the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York. Citing Second Circuit precedent, particularly United States v. Annabi, the filing asserts that such agreements are limited to the district in which they are made unless they explicitly state a broader scope. The document refutes an opposing argument from an individual named Maxwell, stating the NPA lacks the necessary language to apply to other districts.
DOJ-OGR-00020582.jpg
This is a Motion Information Statement filed on July 15, 2022, in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit for the case USA v. Maxwell (Docket No. 22-1426). Attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim, on behalf of her client Ghislaine Maxwell, is formally requesting to be relieved from her duties as continued counsel for the appeal. The opposing party is the United States, represented by AUSAs from the Southern District of New York.
DOJ-OGR-00009083.jpg
This document is a portion of a juror questionnaire (Juror ID: 50) for the legal case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on February 24, 2022. The juror denies having any personal knowledge of or dealings with the defendant Ghislaine Maxwell, Jeffrey Epstein, or any of the named prosecutors from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York. This section of the questionnaire is designed to identify potential conflicts of interest or bias among prospective jurors.
DOJ-OGR-00009774.jpg
This document is a page from a juror questionnaire (Juror ID 50) filed on March 24, 2022, for case 20-cr-00330-ABN. The juror responds to a series of questions about their personal relationships with key case participants. The juror explicitly denies having any personal knowledge of or dealings with defendant Ghislaine Maxwell, Jeffrey Epstein, or any of the named prosecutors from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York.
DOJ-OGR-00009676.jpg
This document is a page from a juror questionnaire (Juror ID 50) for the legal case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on March 9, 2022. The juror responds to a series of questions, denying any personal knowledge of or past/present dealings with the defendant Ghislaine Maxwell, Jeffrey Epstein, or any of the named prosecutors from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York. The juror consistently answers "No" to all questions regarding personal relationships with case participants.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity