jury room
LocationRelationship Network
DOJ-OGR-00017335.jpg
This document is page 2 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330 (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on August 10, 2022. Prosecutor Ms. Moe addresses the Court in the absence of the jury, first noting a safety caution regarding an open door to the jury room. She then argues against a defense letter filed earlier that morning, stating it repeats arguments regarding jury instructions that the Court had already rejected the previous day.
DOJ-OGR-00017294.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. It details a sidebar or open court discussion during jury deliberations where the Judge addresses a question from the jury, confirms the schedule for dismissal at 5:00 PM, and arranges lunch for the following day. The Judge also notes a directive from the Chief Judge requiring masks to be worn in the jury room due to a COVID-19 variant.
DOJ-OGR-00017277.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. It records the end of a trial day during the jury deliberation phase, where the judge acknowledges a note from the jury to leave at 5:30 PM and provides strict instructions not to discuss the case or consume outside information. The judge instructs the jury to resume deliberations the following morning at 9:00 AM once all 12 jurors are present.
DOJ-OGR-00017275.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. It records the final moments of the trial before jury deliberations began, including the dismissal of alternate jurors, the swearing-in of a U.S. Marshal to safeguard deliberations, and the official start of deliberations at 4:49 p.m. Ms. Williams is identified as a court official managing logistics for the jurors and exhibits.
DOJ-OGR-00017273.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a conversation between a judge and several attorneys (Ms. Sternheim, Mr. Pagliuca, Mr. Everdell) about the procedures for jury deliberations. The judge outlines the schedule, including a 9:00 a.m. start time, and clarifies that exhibits will be provided automatically to the jury. The discussion also covers the roles of court staff like the deputy and marshal in managing the jury process.
DOJ-OGR-00017269.jpg
This document is page 3082 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on August 10, 2022. It contains the judge's charge to the jury, instructing them to reach a verdict based solely on evidence and the law, without being swayed by sympathy or consequences. The text also outlines the protocol for deliberations, emphasizing that every juror should be heard, no one should dominate the room, and jurors should be open to changing their views while maintaining honest convictions.
DOJ-OGR-00017267.jpg
This document is a court transcript of a judge's instructions to a jury in the criminal case against Ms. Maxwell. The judge outlines the procedures for deliberation, including the election of a foreperson, the method for communicating with the court via written notes, and the process for requesting testimony. Crucially, the judge explicitly instructs the jury not to consider punishment in their deliberations, focusing solely on the evidence to determine guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
DOJ-OGR-00017262.jpg
This document is a page of jury instructions from a criminal trial, case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on August 10, 2022. It contains two specific instructions: Instruction No. 49, which directs the jury not to draw any negative inference from the defendant, Ms. Maxwell's, decision not to testify, and Instruction No. 50, which advises the jury not to make assumptions based on uncalled witnesses, as both parties had an equal opportunity to call them.
DOJ-OGR-00013587.jpg
A court transcript page filed on August 10, 2022, documenting a procedural pause in a trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330). Attorneys Ms. Moe and Ms. Comey request a private discussion in the robing room with the defense's consent, leading the judge to excuse the jury. The transcript notes that the subsequent pages (2020-2024) regarding this discussion are sealed.
DOJ-OGR-00010246.jpg
This is page 31 of a court transcript from the Ghislaine Maxwell case (1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on March 11, 2022. Defense attorneys Sternheim and Everdell are arguing with the Judge regarding the scope of questioning for a juror who allegedly failed to disclose a history of sexual abuse. The defense is pushing to question the juror about his public statements to reporters and a specific post directed to victim Annie Farmer, while the Judge refuses to allow questions about internal jury deliberations.
DOJ-OGR-00010181.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated February 22, 2022. An attorney, Mr. Shechtman, is arguing before a judge, refuting the government's claim that his client, Mr. Parse, benefited from a particular juror. Shechtman contends that the acquittal was the result of a split verdict caused by a single 'partisan' juror who was unable to convince the rest of the jury to convict, and that this outcome was not a benefit derived from her presence.
DOJ-OGR-00009833.jpg
This legal document argues that a hearing to question Juror 50 should be strictly limited in scope and conducted by the Court itself. The author contends the inquiry should only focus on whether the juror intentionally lied in response to specific voir dire questions and was actually biased, citing legal precedent and Federal Rule of Evidence 606(b) to prevent improper questioning about jury deliberations. This approach is recommended to avoid harassment of the juror regarding sensitive topics like sexual abuse and to prevent the defendant from introducing inadmissible subjects.
DOJ-OGR-00009718.jpg
This legal document presents evidence of potential juror misconduct in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. It includes a screenshot of a deleted tweet, allegedly from Juror No. 50, to a witness/victim (@anniefarmer), stating her story was critical to the jury's verdict. The document further alleges that this juror posted about his jury service on Instagram in early January 2022, despite having told the Court during voir dire that he had deleted his account.
DOJ-OGR-00009711.jpg
This legal document details a post-verdict interview given by Juror No. 50 (using the name Scotty David) to The Independent on January 4, 2022. The juror revealed that he was a victim of sexual abuse, shared this personal story with the jury during deliberations, and used his own experience to validate the accusers' testimonies. He explicitly stated that he disregarded the testimony of defense expert Dr. Elizabeth Loftus on memory, influencing the jury based on his personal beliefs.
DOJ-OGR-00014744.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the dismissal of a jury after a unanimous verdict. The judge confirms the verdict with two individual jurors, Juror No. 119 and Juror No. 7, before formally dismissing the entire jury. The judge provides explicit instructions that while jurors are free to discuss their own experiences, they are forbidden from revealing the identities of other jurors or any information under seal, including the identities of anonymous witnesses.
DOJ-OGR-00014730.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, in which the judge addresses the jury. The judge confirms the jury's requested deliberation schedule to end at 5 p.m. and resume the next morning, while also outlining future scheduling. The judge strongly reminds the jury of strict COVID-19 protocols, including mandatory KN95/N95 masking and social distancing, due to the omicron variant.
DOJ-OGR-00014718.jpg
This is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, where the judge addresses a letter from the defense. Ms. Moe, likely a prosecutor, points out that the letter rehashes an argument the Court already rejected the previous day. The judge affirms this, stating that the legal instructions given to the jury were correct and remain so, thereby dismissing the defense's implicit challenge.
DOJ-OGR-00014674.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. It records a discussion between the Court, prosecutor Ms. Comey, and defense attorney Ms. Sternheim regarding responses to jury notes, dismissal times during deliberations, lunch orders for the jury, and strict COVID-19 mask protocols mandated by the Chief Judge.
DOJ-OGR-00014656.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. The judge is dismissing the jury for the day, instructing them to have no communication about the case with anyone and to resume deliberations at 9:00 a.m. the following morning. The judge also mentions a Ms. Williams will handle their lunch orders.
DOJ-OGR-00014654.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a judge's final instructions to a jury before they begin deliberations. The judge dismisses the alternate jurors and outlines the procedures for the 12 deliberating jurors, including how to communicate with the court, before officially sending them to deliberate at 4:49 p.m.
DOJ-OGR-00014652.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022. In it, the judge (THE COURT) outlines the logistical procedures for jury deliberations to the involved parties (Ms. Sternheim, Mr. Pagliuca, Mr. Everdell). The discussion covers the daily schedule for deliberations, the materials the jury will be given (instructions, verdict form, exhibits), and the roles of court staff in managing the process.
DOJ-OGR-00014648.jpg
This document contains instructions to a jury, emphasizing that their verdict must be based solely on evidence and law, not sympathy. It outlines proper deliberation conduct, urging all jurors to be heard without any single individual dominating, and advises them to be open to changing their views if genuinely convinced they are wrong, but not to surrender honest convictions merely due to being outnumbered.
DOJ-OGR-00014646.jpg
This document outlines jury instructions for deliberations in the case of Ms. Maxwell, advising jurors not to consider punishment and detailing procedures for electing a foreperson and communicating with the court. It specifies that requests for testimony or other communications must be in writing, signed by the foreperson, and submitted via marshals. The document also provides contact information for Southern District Reporters, P.C.
DOJ-OGR-00014587.jpg
This document is page 187 of a court transcript (Document 767) filed on August 10, 2022, related to Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It contains the judge's charge to the jury, specifically instructing them not to research the case externally or communicate about it outside the jury room. It also details Instruction No. 4, explaining that statements made by attorneys are arguments, not evidence, and that the jury's own recollection of the evidence must control their decision.
DOJ-OGR-00014585.jpg
This document is a jury charge from a legal proceeding, specifically Instruction No. 2 regarding the role of the jury. The judge instructs the jury that they are the exclusive judges of the facts and must base their verdict solely on the evidence presented, while also being bound to follow the law exactly as the judge provides it. The document clarifies that statements, arguments, and questions from lawyers do not constitute evidence.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity