Patrick Leahy
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Chuck Grassley
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003-04-10 | Legislative event | Senator Patrick Leahy made a statement regarding a conference committee's decision to drop langua... | Congress | View |
DOJ-OGR-00021118.jpg
This document is a page from a legal brief (Case 22-1426) filed on February 28, 2023. It argues against the District Court's reliance on a floor statement by Senator Leahy regarding the PROTECT Act and the constitutionality of retroactive prosecution. The text contends that the court improperly applied the standards of 'Stogner v. California' (2003) to analyze Leahy's remarks, noting that Stogner was decided after the PROTECT Act was passed.
DOJ-OGR-00002991.jpg
This legal document is a page from a court filing that refutes a defendant's argument about the legislative intent of Section 3283. The author argues the defendant used a misleading, selective quote from Senator Patrick Leahy to claim Congress did not intend for an extended statute of limitations to apply retroactively. The document provides the full quotation to show that Congress removed the retroactivity provision due to constitutional concerns, not to limit the statute's application as the defendant suggests.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017608.jpg
This document is a page from a legal brief or journal article submitted by attorney David Schoen to the House Oversight Committee. It discusses the legislative history and intent of the Crime Victims' Rights Act of 2004 (CVRA), contrasting it with the 1990 Victims' Rights and Restitution Act. It highlights the Congressional goal to ensure victims are treated with fairness, dignity, and are active participants in the legal system, citing various Senators and legal precedents.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025870.jpg
This document appears to be page 18 of an annual report from the Office of Government Information Services (OGIS). It outlines future goals regarding FOIA mediation and policy review and extends special thanks to members of the 113th Congress (including Senators Leahy and Grassley, and Reps. Issa and Cummings) and staff at the National Archives. While part of a larger House Oversight document dump (indicated by the footer), this specific page contains no direct mention of Jeffrey Epstein or specific criminal investigations.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014044.jpg
This document is page 65 of a 2014 law review article detailing the history of the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). It explains that in April 2004, advocates shifted focus from a constitutional amendment to federal legislation due to the difficulty of obtaining a supermajority. The text discusses the limitations of the 1990 Victims' Rights and Restitution Act and cites various legal scholars and Senators (Kyl, Leahy, Feinstein) regarding the legislative history. This document appears in the House Oversight collection likely as background material regarding the legal framework relevant to the Epstein case's non-prosecution agreement.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022377.jpg
This document, produced by EY following the 2016 election, provides a profile of expected US Senate committee leadership for the upcoming Congress. It details the chairmen and ranking members for key committees and analyzes the various political scenarios influencing these appointments, such as retirements, term limits, and senators' strategic choices. Despite the prompt's framing, the document's content is purely about US Senate politics and contains no information related to Jeffrey Epstein.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity