This legal document is a filing by the Government arguing against the defendant's (Maxwell's) claims. The Government refutes the defendant's assertion that she was protected by a civil protective order when giving deposition testimony, citing case law (e.g., Andover Data Servs., Davis) to establish that such orders do not provide the same protections as the Fifth Amendment. The document also dismisses the defendant's claim that the Government's conduct violated her due process rights as "meritless."
This document appears to be a page from an article or blog post discussing gender studies, specifically focusing on the concept of masculinity and male privilege. It references educator Katz (likely Jackson Katz), the Dove Real Beauty campaign, and an article by Thomas Millar regarding male sexuality. The text analyzes the societal pressures on men regarding masculinity compared to women. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018576' Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a document production for a US House Oversight Committee investigation.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity