| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Recruiter |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Principal recruiter |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Recruitment |
1
|
1 |
An FBI file containing a newspaper clipping from The Palm Beach Post dated August 4, 2006. The editorial by Elisa Cramer criticizes the State Attorney's Office for charging Jeffrey Epstein with solicitation rather than pedophilia-related crimes, despite police evidence proving the victims were underage (14-17). The article highlights comments from the State Attorney's spokesman admitting that wealth influences justice and details evidence such as school transcripts and Myspace activity.
This document appears to be an editorial or article criticizing the State Attorney's handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case, specifically the failure to charge him with crimes against minors despite police evidence. It details evidence found by police (school transcripts, trash), instances proving the girls were students (missing appointments for soccer or class), and the defense tactics used by Alan Dershowitz to discredit victims via their MySpace activity. It also mentions witness intimidation by private investigators and questions why a lenient plea deal was offered.
This document is a reprint of a Palm Beach Post editorial dated August 10, 2006, titled 'Massaging the system.' It heavily criticizes State Attorney Barry Krischer for referring the Jeffrey Epstein case to a grand jury rather than prosecuting directly, suggesting favoritism toward the wealthy defendant. The text details police findings, including payments to minors and physical evidence (school transcripts) found in Epstein's trash that contradicted his defense claims of ignorance regarding the victims' ages.
This document is an FBI form containing an August 4, 2006, editorial from The Palm Beach Post by Elisa Cramer, which is highly critical of the state attorney's handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case. Cramer argues that Epstein, 53, should have faced charges for sex with minors (ages 14-17) rather than a single solicitation charge, questioning the decision to offer a plea deal and not proceed to a jury trial. The article highlights evidence that Epstein knew the girls' ages, his defense team's tactics to discredit victims, and raises concerns about a two-tiered justice system for the wealthy.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity