Judge Koeltl
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-03-30 | N/A | Lawsuit dismissal by Judge Koeltl reported via email. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2016-10-20 | N/A | Court appearance before Judge Koeltl regarding substitution of counsel. | Court (implied SDNY) | View |
EFTA00032877.pdf
An email dated October 19, 2016, from the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS) regarding a court appearance scheduled for the next day before Judge Koeltl. The email discusses the need for a substitution of counsel for a defendant and notes that attorneys Bobbie Sternheim and Ruhnke are conflicted.
EFTA00029955.pdf
This document is an email dated March 30, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York. The email discusses the dismissal of a lawsuit by Judge Koeltl and outlines a plan to request materials that were disclosed to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team during an upcoming discussion.
EFTA00028274.pdf
This document is a letter dated November 8, 2021, from defense attorney Christian R. Everdell to the US Attorney's Office regarding United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It serves as a Rule 16 disclosure, listing specific documents the defense may use in their case-in-chief, including AT&T phone records, FedEx records, Customs and Border Patrol records, Shopper's Travel records, and Larry Visoski flight manifests. The letter also lists General Releases from the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program (with names redacted), Palm Beach residence floorplans, and the Jeffrey Epstein Non-Prosecution Agreement.
DOJ-OGR-00001764.jpg
This is page 2 of a legal letter addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan, dated August 24, 2020, filed in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The defense argues against the government's characterization of Maxwell's actions as 'cherry-picking' and challenges the government's issuance of subpoenas as not being 'standard practice,' citing Second Circuit case law (Martindell) regarding protective orders and civil discovery. Large portions of the document are redacted.
DOJ-OGR-00019575.jpg
Page 2 of a legal letter addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan dated August 24, 2020. The document argues against the government's characterization of Ms. Maxwell's defense strategy and disputes the government's claim that their issuance of subpoenas was 'standard practice,' citing case law (Martindell) to argue that the procedure used was improper. The document contains significant redactions.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity